Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

High School & College Sports Enthusiast Jim Hammett breaks it down for you!
youngbuck
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1121
Joined: October 15th, 2008, 10:29 pm
Reputation: 139

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby youngbuck » August 28th, 2017, 6:50 pm

bigrig15 wrote:Saw CC play 7 on 7 and they looked really good. If they can block I think they will be able to compete cause they have tons of skill. 

Probably not going to be able to give up 50 and win many games.



  • Advertisement
silentbob
Junior
Junior
Posts: 127
Joined: October 5th, 2014, 8:46 pm
Reputation: 16

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby silentbob » August 29th, 2017, 8:47 am

CC gave up 55 in game 1 i think??  QB is pretty good and have a couple WR.  But, not playing D and throwing the ball 40 times a game doesn't typically add up to a successful season.  

SwaggyJ23
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 259
Joined: August 26th, 2017, 5:46 pm
Reputation: 29

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby SwaggyJ23 » August 29th, 2017, 8:59 am

Everybody is sleeping on Huntingdon. Their running back is a freak

Crimson's Ghost
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 9298
Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am
Reputation: 653

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby Crimson's Ghost » August 29th, 2017, 10:03 am

Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.  

Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it. 

Manfred
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4565
Joined: August 2nd, 2009, 7:23 pm
Reputation: 184

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby Manfred » August 29th, 2017, 12:12 pm

Crimson's Ghost wrote:Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.  

Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it. 

Expecting 6-4.  Any more will be gravy.
The world as we know it underwent a rebirth 11-8-16. Conservatives have made themselves heard!

User avatar
DragonsDoExist
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 3590
Joined: September 10th, 2012, 1:49 pm
Reputation: 325

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby DragonsDoExist » August 29th, 2017, 2:25 pm

I don't think anyone is "sleeping" on Huntingdon. They've been one of the favorites for this year since last season ended.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You play to win the game!!!

youngbuck
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1121
Joined: October 15th, 2008, 10:29 pm
Reputation: 139

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby youngbuck » August 29th, 2017, 2:42 pm

Manfred wrote:
Crimson's Ghost wrote:Huntington is a good team, and I think they'll be right in it until the end. I don't think many people are sleeping on them, just people are more trusting of Tyrone and Central until proven otherwise.  

Forest Hills feels like a bigger sleeper at the moment. They could have a big year, but they definitely need to prove it. 

Expecting 6-4.  Any more will be gravy.

??? BG and Johnstown.  Who else are you expecting them to lose to?  

Lefteyelouie
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1778
Joined: September 14th, 2004, 3:56 pm
Reputation: 11
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby Lefteyelouie » August 29th, 2017, 2:48 pm

I wasn't expecting much out of FH this year. I thought Cecere and Long were pretty much all they had. Am I wrong on that? Do they have some young guys we haven't heard about?

Crimson's Ghost
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 9298
Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am
Reputation: 653

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby Crimson's Ghost » August 29th, 2017, 2:51 pm

Section I of the LHAC shouldn't present a lot of challenges to Forest Hills outside of BG.  BC, PC, and CC are locks for wins.

Forest Hills should be 7-3 or better. 

Manfred
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4565
Joined: August 2nd, 2009, 7:23 pm
Reputation: 184

Re: Very Early Preseason District Six Football Rankings

Postby Manfred » August 29th, 2017, 5:36 pm

Lefteyelouie wrote:I wasn't expecting much out of FH this year.  I thought Cecere and Long were pretty much all they had.  Am I wrong on that?  Do they have some young guys we haven't heard about?

The 2nd string Qb, Evan Kundrod, is also a starting receiver, and has played well as a Sr.  Another 2 receivers, Forrest Wolfhope and Seth Richardson, have stepped up as well.  The young linemen have played pretty well, gotten a bit more size than last year.  Shawn Sikora has returned as a Sr. tailback/ LB and is an accomplished powerlifter.  You forgot Elgin as a RB/ LB.
The world as we know it underwent a rebirth 11-8-16. Conservatives have made themselves heard!


Return to “Crimson's Corner”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest