BleacherCoaches.com

so does anyone know which teams/schools send kids to a Tech center or not? That might help give a clearer idea. Although that 123 number isn't much lower than what it was for this cycle (129 to 123). That is a concern, unless some traditional class A teams now are clearly above the 123 line because ...

In regard to Guru 's post, BG has 7 success points (6 is the requirement), and 6 transfers listed on their past 2 eligibility lists (3 is the requirement) over this past 2 year cycle, so yes they should have to bump up.

they have more than just Garner who did not play/come up through the parochial system. They had 3 listed on their roster last year that are transfers and 3 different ones this year. Maybe they are not all impact players, but at least a few of them are recognizable.

It's 50 percent

That is what I have been wondering too Earl. And I agree with you coach and roadie, it is a shame that you can throw a co-op together one month before the season starts with really good players from two schools, and still remain Class A. And there's another local school that just decided to have a c...

Those parameters were released almost a month ago, but I have heard a few local AD'S talking about this change since that time. It sounded like some were going back to the PIAA to see about their numbers being adjusted. Wouldn't this then affect the 138 cut off for class A?

I have heard of this issue within the past week as well. Now, with some of these schools trying this method, won't it change the cut off lines already established for each sport? (For instance, the football parameter for 1A was 138)

Hey Crimson, completely off topic here, but did the Bair kid from McCort pitch at all this year? He is a pretty top prospect isn't he? I figured he would be hard for other teams to touch if he was pitching.

Thanks dragons, and now I see that they are all posted on the PIAA site. But thanks again.

Where are you guys seeing all of the game listings? Are they posted online somewhere yet?