41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
youngbuck
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1532
Joined: October 15th, 2008, 10:29 pm

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by youngbuck »

knowitall wrote:United had fifteen kids dressed for its week two game.
What is the over for total kids dressed at CV vs Shade today? 40?  
Colonel Mustard
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 551
Joined: October 25th, 2011, 9:51 pm

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by Colonel Mustard »

Two things here that I don't know how you fix: 1. Some teams are just bad. It's sad when you only have one or 2 close games a weekend, but not every school is overmatched, some are just bad. And it goes in cycles, some years you have kids that care and can play and some years you don't.  2. Maniacal, thin-skinned, self-absorbed coaches. Some want to show their dominance, some want to showcase their program, some want revenge for some slight or extra TD scored against their team five years ago.  Bailey put in his 2nd team O to start the 4th quarter. CH left their first team D in, which pummelled Richlands back-ups. Bailey was visibly pissed on the sidelines. So he puts his first teamers back in to score again.  And I assume feels justice is served???  It's not the kids fault, and the fans (that are still paying attention at this point) are looking at each other just saying why????
EnzoLigoniere
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 725
Joined: October 5th, 2016, 4:07 pm

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by EnzoLigoniere »

Why should starters at Richland or LV or any other school be punished and have to sit after working hard , just because they are better, worked hard , have a better team. These coaches have to put in kids who may not have busted there tail all summer in preparation. How is that fair to kids like Kyrie and Burke or any other top end talent?

Now the other side of the coin is a team like FH that was to busy letting Cecere become all time leading passer to develop younger players and now dont have any younger players developed ready to become the work horse.

I see both sides of the argument. But is not the purpose of competitive sports to push the athletes to get better and work harder. If you dont like getting stomped, get better,, like in life if you are getting passed over for a promotion, work harder , dont changes Jobs
tubmill
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1604
Joined: November 28th, 2003, 8:18 am

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by tubmill »

youngbuck wrote:Richland and LV were made for each other, Beitel and Bailey
Stay classy!
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 8979
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by El-Moldo »

ENZO: Don't like how you insinuated that FH coaches left Cecere in games too long last year. FH only had 2 blow-outs last year, against Somerset (41-14) and CC (49-6). FH lost to CR and Richland. Should Bailey have taken him out early in those games? Close wins were against WH (28-14) and PC (16-12). Should he have been taken out early then? Other FH wins against Bedford, BM, CH, and BG were close after 3 quarters. Risk taking him out early then?? And both playoff games were a win against WH 30-22 and a loss to BEA 21-16. Shouldn't he have been kept in till the end in BOTH of these games. Don Bailey knew what he was doing in ALL of those games. How many of these games did YOU see. Nice try, though.
sasquatch260
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 233
Joined: December 7th, 2015, 2:46 am

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by sasquatch260 »

Crimson's Ghost wrote:Who cares 
My guess would be losers and jealous people who haven't experienced much success in life.

There are two ways to look at this.
1. Those big bad teams are hurting us. Let's get rid of them.
2. Those big bad teams are doing something right. Let's appreciate that and then figure out a way to get to the point where we can complete with them. No matter how long that takes.

Successful people will always chose number 2. Others will figure out a way to justify number 1.
knowitall
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2806
Joined: March 23rd, 2005, 5:58 pm

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by knowitall »

So how would Brandon Bailey turn around Ferndale or Greater Johnstown?  Did Kevin Marabito just become a bad coach overnight at United?  What could a Roger Beitel do at North Star?
EnzoLigoniere
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 725
Joined: October 5th, 2016, 4:07 pm

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by EnzoLigoniere »

knowitall wrote:So how would Brandon Bailey turn around Ferndale or Greater Johnstown?  Did Kevin Marabito just become a bad coach overnight at United?  What could a Roger Beitel do at North Star?
What about Marion Center, they have a similar size advantage in the Heritage, but they are not getting forfeited to? Also not winning games like LV.  No one is complaining about them needing to be in a different conference.   
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 8979
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: 41-8, 36-6, 47-7, 42-7, 48-14, 48-0, 62-21, 42-6, 65-14, 55-22, 41-8

Post by El-Moldo »

If Myers would have got in the BG game last year, with FH leading in the second half, why would he be throwing anyway? Then others would be griping and moaning about FH passing and rubbing it in. And don't forget, last year BG was still a powerhouse. Final score was only 30-10. Why let them back in the game by putting in the second-string QB if it was only EARLY IN THE 3RD QUARTER? Try again.
Post Reply