I Think It's Time
Posted: August 11th, 2009, 3:20 pm
The technical definition of fascism is when government controls private industries and thus, the ways, means and methods of society.
The collusion between the Federal Government, Congress, the DNC and the old media or America's version of Pravda TASS and Izvestia are the purveyors of the "soft-fascism" that we are witnessing by Pelosi, Reid and Obama, and their minions, e.g., Mr. Blackledge.
Progressives, i.e., Marxists, the name openly used by the far left, radical Democrats, use triangulation or the Hegelian Dialectic to frame public discourse.
Projectionism is part of this thesis, antithesis and synthesis attack on average, concerned citizens. As, the hateful-left calls average Americans Nazis, they are projecting their own intentions... Just read how they name their bills in Congress, they are most always 180 degrees from their titles or resolution names. Why lie to the American people in naming bills unless these laws equate to the theft of our freedoms and money? Why?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
BTW, . George Soros, who Vman has ranted about in the past & once pledged his entire fortune in an unsuccessful effort to unseat George Bush, has pledged another $5 million to overcome popular opposition to the government takeover of the health-care industry....…Remind me again which side is Astroturfing and getting big, powerful firms funding their operation, and which one represents the actual sense of Americans on government-controlled health care.
Here is the way they control the debate in our society now; utilized much the same way the Soviet communists did in perfecting their control of public discourse. (Of course, that could only work for a couple of generations before it bankrupted their country.)
The Feds and or Congress create a problem, anticipating in advance the reaction that the population will have to the given crisis, and thus conditioning the people that a change is needed.
The antithesis is we must not let this looming fear harm our children and kill millions of people. Thus, the outcome of the so-called public "debate" — which supposedly weighs the concerns of the public (except for concerned citizens attending public forums) with a manufactured mandate to do something. In the current context, that is control of every American's health, bank accounts, property and freedoms... and as a result, must be enacted as public policy without criticism or delay.
The Democrat leadership has stated publicly that anyone that disagrees, is un-American... And that is the start of their triangulation against any concerned citizen that disagrees with a Socialist take-over of our lives.
The thesis is America has a problem, a bunch of "un-American mobs" are opposing "the public debate." The progressive's antithesis, "we must save America from these mobs," and then the synthesis or solution: to paint any opposition as "fringe or extreme," and thus, to be completely discounted.
Time to wake up folks :!:
The collusion between the Federal Government, Congress, the DNC and the old media or America's version of Pravda TASS and Izvestia are the purveyors of the "soft-fascism" that we are witnessing by Pelosi, Reid and Obama, and their minions, e.g., Mr. Blackledge.
Progressives, i.e., Marxists, the name openly used by the far left, radical Democrats, use triangulation or the Hegelian Dialectic to frame public discourse.
Projectionism is part of this thesis, antithesis and synthesis attack on average, concerned citizens. As, the hateful-left calls average Americans Nazis, they are projecting their own intentions... Just read how they name their bills in Congress, they are most always 180 degrees from their titles or resolution names. Why lie to the American people in naming bills unless these laws equate to the theft of our freedoms and money? Why?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
BTW, . George Soros, who Vman has ranted about in the past & once pledged his entire fortune in an unsuccessful effort to unseat George Bush, has pledged another $5 million to overcome popular opposition to the government takeover of the health-care industry....…Remind me again which side is Astroturfing and getting big, powerful firms funding their operation, and which one represents the actual sense of Americans on government-controlled health care.
Here is the way they control the debate in our society now; utilized much the same way the Soviet communists did in perfecting their control of public discourse. (Of course, that could only work for a couple of generations before it bankrupted their country.)
The Feds and or Congress create a problem, anticipating in advance the reaction that the population will have to the given crisis, and thus conditioning the people that a change is needed.
The antithesis is we must not let this looming fear harm our children and kill millions of people. Thus, the outcome of the so-called public "debate" — which supposedly weighs the concerns of the public (except for concerned citizens attending public forums) with a manufactured mandate to do something. In the current context, that is control of every American's health, bank accounts, property and freedoms... and as a result, must be enacted as public policy without criticism or delay.
The Democrat leadership has stated publicly that anyone that disagrees, is un-American... And that is the start of their triangulation against any concerned citizen that disagrees with a Socialist take-over of our lives.
The thesis is America has a problem, a bunch of "un-American mobs" are opposing "the public debate." The progressive's antithesis, "we must save America from these mobs," and then the synthesis or solution: to paint any opposition as "fringe or extreme," and thus, to be completely discounted.
Time to wake up folks :!: