Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
vman
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2782
Joined: February 20th, 2006, 11:40 am

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by vman »

McCort all the way wrote: They should have won the first match up but the Refs made some very hurtful calls on the Rams.
Yea, heard same thing from several Ram fans.....but remember in reg season home team (Donbo in this case) can hire any relatv....errrr referee they wish! In playoffs officials are assigned by D6 so unless D6 chair picks a crew from Summerhill or Adams Twp. Rams should have chance to prevail. Wanna predict Rams 28 -27 (w/ missed PAT being dif)- BUT - Just can't get the vision of Richland literally never stopping McCort's first string outta' my head! Hence, rangers live to play another day: 35 - 21 :?:
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
MarauderMan
Freshman
Freshman
Posts: 33
Joined: October 31st, 2009, 5:34 pm

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by MarauderMan »

McCort all the way wrote:I think Richland is going to pull it out this time. They should have won the first match up but the Refs made some very hurtful calls on the Rams. This time there will be much better field conditions and Richland has gotten much better. What are everyones thoughts?



I was at that game as well. I agree Richland could have won the game but I dont think the fact that they didn't had anything to do with the refs. What did the refs do to hurt the Rams? Coach deciding to go for it on 4th and 2 on his own 30 with the lead seemed to hurt the Rams..... of course if Bill Belicheck can do it I guess Brandon Baily can too...lol
MarauderMan
Freshman
Freshman
Posts: 33
Joined: October 31st, 2009, 5:34 pm

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by MarauderMan »

vman wrote:
McCort all the way wrote: They should have won the first match up but the Refs made some very hurtful calls on the Rams.
Yea, heard same thing from several Ram fans.....but remember in reg season home team (Donbo in this case) can hire any relatv....errrr referee they wish! In playoffs officials are assigned by D6 so unless D6 chair picks a crew from Summerhill or Adams Twp. Rams should have chance to prevail. Wanna predict Rams 28 -27 (w/ missed PAT being dif)- BUT - Just can't get the vision of Richland literally never stopping McCort's first string outta' my head! Hence, rangers live to play another day: 35 - 21 :?:

oh yea...I almost forgot. As I was leaving the refs were walking of the field and I overheard them talking to the FH guy who was escorting them. They were from State College area..... I doubt old Don even knows them.. Nice try Ram fan.
pats39
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 824
Joined: February 4th, 2008, 10:19 pm

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by pats39 »

WRONG

DON BO knows everyone...in the world

DON BO can sneeze with his eyes open

Forest Hill school district is not a democracy, its a DONatorship

Don Bo does not sleep, he waits
User avatar
MASTERMIND
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 71
Joined: October 20th, 2009, 9:27 am

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by MASTERMIND »

Can Don Bo kick Chuck Norris' Butt?
youngbuck
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1532
Joined: October 15th, 2008, 10:29 pm

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by youngbuck »

I think that people are confusing having a big rb with being a physical team. Rizzo is a beast, but one player does not make a team physical.
tomahawkchop
Freshman
Freshman
Posts: 12
Joined: November 17th, 2009, 8:30 am

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by tomahawkchop »

salemforpresident wrote:I can tell you that the Rams would be favored by 21 to 24 over Portage or Windber.
i thought this was about richland and forest hills?
but of course it becomes a thread about the so called "weakpac"
pats39
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 824
Joined: February 4th, 2008, 10:19 pm

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by pats39 »

Agreed to an extent. Rizzo does make that false impression. With that said, Richland is much more phyiscal in past years, but I would argue it is mostly due to him but not his doing. Not because he is actually doing it himself as they have had and have other quality running backs, simply because BB is actually using his running game this year and not passing NEARLY as much as last year and the year before, due to a combination of having such an imposing back and having an all around better line, making BB finally realize a running game is needed. If only he could have realized that in seasons past they could have won a few more close games but that is history. Having teams actually worry about the run game makes the passing game so much more effective for obvious reasons (less in the box, less blitzes, element of surprise etc etc).

Interesting to see how BB changes the offense next year, as they rightfully should atleast to a degree.
knightrider
Junior
Junior
Posts: 133
Joined: October 4th, 2008, 10:38 am

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by knightrider »

Richland playing in a hostile enviroment + Richland will give FH to much respect = FH wins based off of tradition, experience and pride. Should be a good game and worth it to go see the FH crazies going nuts and the Richland fans going off on the refs after each call.

Its a father/son thing,,,, and the old man will never lose to the son. Imagine that Thanksgiving Dinner, if Richland won. wowzer
kingdomofcrush07
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 422
Joined: September 6th, 2007, 6:26 pm

Re: Richland vs. Forest Hills round 2

Post by kingdomofcrush07 »

what is physical? Running the ball 10 straight times to the endzone made richland look pretty physical
Post Reply