CFP committee
-
konjo78
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 4565
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
- Location: tri cities, Washington
Re: CFP committee
They fit 4 of the 5. More than penn state or mich did if you really want to argue it.
-
GoldenRamsFAN
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 720
- Joined: November 12th, 2015, 1:09 pm
Re: CFP committee
The only 1 I see them fitting is your number 2...I would say USC would have been more interesting to watch then either Washington or OSU
-
konjo78
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 4565
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
- Location: tri cities, Washington
Re: CFP committee
Washington played plenty of top 25 teams and won in blowouts.
Usc is only a topic because they ended the year strong but no way deserved a top 4 appearance.
Usc is only a topic because they ended the year strong but no way deserved a top 4 appearance.
-
GoldenRamsFAN
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 720
- Joined: November 12th, 2015, 1:09 pm
Re: CFP committee
Plenty? I have USC and Colorado
-
konjo78
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 4565
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
- Location: tri cities, Washington
Re: CFP committee
Stanford? Wash state was ranked at the time. Utah?
-
GoldenRamsFAN
- Official BleacherCoach
- Posts: 720
- Joined: November 12th, 2015, 1:09 pm
Re: CFP committee
Ok at the time Stanford wasn't and wash st was 8-5...
Re: CFP committee
USC is the only one that should be somewhat considered but they lost to bama by 50 so they got it right