Steelers discussion

The name says it all!
deepcreek
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 592
Joined: June 23rd, 2009, 9:35 am

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by deepcreek »

knowitall wrote:
deepcreek wrote:I know you are being sarcastic, but I wish that would happen.   Yes, things were better back in my day when players did not try to draw attention to themselves.   
Is it the fate of everyone to grow old and miserable?
I suppose, although I thought the same thing at 15 even though I'm pushing 50 now.
PAMDGrappler
Junior
Junior
Posts: 147
Joined: December 1st, 2017, 11:17 am

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by PAMDGrappler »

Interesting game tonight.  On paper, it’s one the Steelers should lose.  However, the defense has been really good during this winning streak.  Like Konjo said, I’m not sure they can keep the streak going without more of a contribution from the offense.  I’m hoping the O can generate a little more tonight against a stout Cleveland D.  I’ll have two TVs hooked up trying to keep up with Pitt and the Steelers simultaneously.  Who freaking scheduled that?!?!? 
ERAChamp
Senior
Senior
Posts: 176
Joined: July 26th, 2017, 12:51 pm

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by ERAChamp »

After last night's brawl, Garrett should be suspended for a minimum of the rest of the season. That was flat out assault.
User avatar
12HankQB
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2797
Joined: August 29th, 2009, 4:32 pm
Location: Mile 129

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by 12HankQB »

Quack, quack quack quack quack.....Gooooooo Duck! Mason is Crosby's doppelganger by looks, but not ability. This offense is just pathetic. 
If only closed minds came with closed mouths
Crimson's Ghost
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 11116
Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by Crimson's Ghost »

He should get arrested, that was garbage. 
CharlieConway
Senior
Senior
Posts: 187
Joined: November 17th, 2017, 12:43 pm
Location: Central Pennsylvania

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by CharlieConway »

Reports from multiple sources from Cleveland, the Cleveland Police Department are not investigating.  The only comment they issued was that an investigation could open if a party brings forth a complaint.  

I'd like to cite the Haynesworth incident.  The guy received stitches, Haynesworth got 5 games.  Helmet was removed and Haynesworth stomped? If I remember correctly?

My prediction:

Garrett - 4 games
Pouncey - 2 games
Ogunjobi -  1 game (I believe he deserves way more), but its what I am predicting.  
Rudolph - 1 game

Fines will also be assessed to Garrett & Pouncey.
Thanks!
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4565
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by konjo78 »

That was ugly last night. The offense keeps losing player after player they are almost at the point they have 0 skill players who were starters last year. Browns felt like they were head hunting last night, obviously i cant actually know that, but the amount of concussions and shots to the head were crazy
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4565
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by konjo78 »

As for that brawl, i think the right move by the NFL would be these.

1. Garrett - indefinitly right now. (Do not let him know when he will be back)

2. Pouncey - 1 game

3. Rudolph - fine

4. DB who targeted Johnston: Fine
knowitall
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2806
Joined: March 23rd, 2005, 5:58 pm

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by knowitall »

That’s a five to ten game suspension in the NHL.  Four games should be sufficient punishment.
Crimson's Ghost
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 11116
Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am

Re: Steelers discussion

Post by Crimson's Ghost »

Suspended indefinitely, just announced. Probably right. Can't have him play another game this year.
Post Reply