MC @ FH
-
hockey_nut
- Freshman

- Posts: 14
- Joined: August 28th, 2003, 3:24 pm
Re: MC @ FH
I left at Half and the score was 20 - 6 FH.
MC showed little signs of life in the first half... and FH basically only made one mistake (interception)
I wouldn't look for much of a comeback but you never know. Looks like FH and BM on the rug.
MC showed little signs of life in the first half... and FH basically only made one mistake (interception)
I wouldn't look for much of a comeback but you never know. Looks like FH and BM on the rug.
-
flakjacket
- Junior

- Posts: 132
- Joined: October 30th, 2005, 9:32 pm
Re: MC @ FH
FINAL SCORE: FH 40- MC 6
I was 5 points off of my prediction of 35-6. Crap! This was a very clean game with a handfull of penalties the whole game. Both teams played well. Good luck Rangers!
I was 5 points off of my prediction of 35-6. Crap! This was a very clean game with a handfull of penalties the whole game. Both teams played well. Good luck Rangers!
Re: MC @ FH
who did all the scoring for FH?
-
Pale Rider
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 885
- Joined: February 20th, 2005, 6:26 pm
Re: MC @ FH
Lazration had I think 3 scores, Oswalt 2, Rearick I think 1.
"What we've got here is...failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. I don't like it anymore than you men." -Strother Martin, COOL HAND LUKE
-
flakjacket
- Junior

- Posts: 132
- Joined: October 30th, 2005, 9:32 pm
Re: MC @ FH
They both played well... as in clean and the best they could. There were about 4-5 penalties all game.
Lazration and Oswalt each had three scores.
Lazration and Oswalt each had three scores.
[hr]
The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit.
- Rush Limbaugh
[align=center]SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM[/align]
The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit.
- Rush Limbaugh
[align=center]SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM[/align]
Re: MC @ FH
I went to the MC / CR game and I think Marion Center gave FH the best game they could. From what I saw against CR, Marion Center had a very suspect pass defense. Forest Hills just took advantage of the most favorable match-up.
I think CR would have matched up better against FH, but I doubt the score would have been much different. Forest Hills would have just spread the ball around a little more instead of going only where they had a decided advantage.
I was surprised that MC didn't switch their matchups against the FH receivers. I don't understand why they thought their smaller CB would be able to cover Jake Oswalt. Although I doubt he would have fared much better against Adam Trout. MC was essentially left with picking their own poison.
I think CR would have matched up better against FH, but I doubt the score would have been much different. Forest Hills would have just spread the ball around a little more instead of going only where they had a decided advantage.
I was surprised that MC didn't switch their matchups against the FH receivers. I don't understand why they thought their smaller CB would be able to cover Jake Oswalt. Although I doubt he would have fared much better against Adam Trout. MC was essentially left with picking their own poison.
-
Pale Rider
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 885
- Joined: February 20th, 2005, 6:26 pm
Re: MC @ FH
flak- my bad. Thanks for the clarification. Sometimes when a bunch of people all stand up at the same time, it's hard to see exactly. FYI- The Richardson clan were in front of me, 3 rows down. But when THEY all stand up, they can cause an eclipse! LOL
"What we've got here is...failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. I don't like it anymore than you men." -Strother Martin, COOL HAND LUKE

