Pitt Wins Nat. Title / Are You Serious?

The name says it all!
Post Reply
User avatar
The Ancient Enemy
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 7549
Joined: October 30th, 2004, 2:47 pm

Pitt Wins Nat. Title / Are You Serious?

Post by The Ancient Enemy »

First off, let me say that I only hate Pitt because Pitt's success hurts Penn State. I don't care about Pitt, personally, and more or less than I care about San Jose State or New Hampshire. I have an enormous amount of respect for Hilltop, Titan, vman, and especially Moldo. You guys deserve to have your team win games.

Secondly, as a college football fan first and a Penn State fan second, I can acknowledge success. Dave Wannstedt has 14 commits from Pennsylvania, many of them highly touted. Yesterday, they nailed that Holley kid from Easton, 4 star CB. It is disgusting, as a Penn State fan, and it really makes me sick. But this recruiting class for Pitt is ridiculous. They really, really did an awesome job recruiting PA this year, and it just goes to show how nice of a guy Wanny really is, even though i don't think super highly of him as a coach. The fact remains, dudes, that Pitt did a great job recruiting, especially for a team who wasn't even bowl eligible in a system where 1/2 the teams in the whole league are bowl eligible.

Pitt capitalized on Penn State's incompetence, again, for atleast the second straight year. It is disgusting to watch this. There should never come a time when one of the top LB's in the US is from PA and doesn't even have PSU in consideration. There should NEVER be a time when any player from Altoona slips from Penn State because of PSU's blatant incompetentce.

How do you sit by idly and watch this go down? How does the PSU staff let Pitt grab these kids?

Rich Rod leaves for Michigan, Petrino left UL and Kragthorphe's worth is being questioned, so is Pitt seriously going to win that conference? How are they not the favorites? I can't find Pitt's 2008 schedule online, but I can't imagine they don't have a shot at going 10-2 or better. There's no reason they should lose to WVU for the next few years, or Louisville.

Another reason why Pitt should play in a BCS game is because Paul Rhoads is gone. That is definitely going to help Pitt. Is Auburn serious? Did theys eriously just replace Will Muschamp with Paul Rhoads, who had 1 decent defensive performance in like 5 years? Way to step up, Auburn.

The times are a-changin' in PA, folks, at least until Paterno gets his geriatric carcass out of Happy Valley.
Last edited by The Ancient Enemy on September 20th, 2011, 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I can and will be hard anytime with or without my boyz!!!" - Hollywood

"Their jerseys make me want to run through the desert and tackle a terrorist." - nLions1
Crimson09Crazy

Re: Pitt Wins Nat. Title / Are You Serious?

Post by Crimson09Crazy »

2008 FOOTBALL SCHEDULE
8-30-08 BOWLING GREEN ....W
9-20-08 IOWA .....W but its the type of game Pitt would lose
10-18-08 at Navy ....... W we avenge the OT loss
11-1-08 at Notre Dame ...... toss up?
TBA BUFFALO ....w
TBA at Syracuse ....w
TBA at Cincinnati .....W
TBA RUTGERS ......W
TBA LOUISVILLE........W
TBA WEST VIRGINIA ......L
TBA at South Florida .......L
TBA at Connecticut ...toss up



nationalchamps.net
its got everyones future schedules plus good previews and other lists....
Last edited by Crimson09Crazy on September 20th, 2011, 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Ancient Enemy
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 7549
Joined: October 30th, 2004, 2:47 pm

Re: Pitt Wins Nat. Title / Are You Serious?

Post by The Ancient Enemy »

I'm curious about Notre Dame, but honestly, I think Rhoads leaving only helps Pitt tremendously, and I can't see them losing any of those other games.
"I can and will be hard anytime with or without my boyz!!!" - Hollywood

"Their jerseys make me want to run through the desert and tackle a terrorist." - nLions1
Post Reply