Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Feature Articles, General Announcements, Etc.
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4565
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by konjo78 »

Some schools are getting such small rosters even if they are in a smaller class they will barely be able to field a roster for 11 man football. Many states use a 7 man style for the smallest classifications. This easily can be used for A football next year. 

Let teams who have small numbers still move up if they have large rosters(pm, bg, others for example) but schools that only get 20 some players can play 7 man football
Birda
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 214
Joined: November 19th, 2013, 2:17 pm

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by Birda »

No, don't force them to play 7-man or move up, but if there is enough interest then you could make a 7-man division for schools under a certain size. Florida has 8 11-man classes, as well as 6-man, 7-man, and 8-man, though these are not in the public school association. What does it matter...you'll still have Philly charter schools running the table, but now they would need to find fewer ringers.
Manfred
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 6077
Joined: August 2nd, 2009, 7:23 pm

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by Manfred »

7 man is for Iowa, North Dakota, etc., not PA.
It ain't over until it's over.
Birda
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 214
Joined: November 19th, 2013, 2:17 pm

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by Birda »

Manfred wrote:7 man is for Iowa, North Dakota, etc., not PA.
And Texas...they have probably over 100 teams. But there wouldn't be enough interest here to make it feasible to travel and schedule opponents.
User avatar
billmurray
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 915
Joined: December 2nd, 2012, 9:43 am
Location: Centre Hall
Contact:

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by billmurray »

no, this is part of the reason the 6 class system was proposed. instead of facing teams with a draw from 180 boys they'll now face teams that draw from 147...that's a big difference in terms of team sizes. 
Birda
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 214
Joined: November 19th, 2013, 2:17 pm

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by Birda »

billmurray wrote:no, this is part of the reason the 6 class system was proposed. instead of facing teams with a draw from 180 boys they'll now face teams that draw from 147...that's a big difference in terms of team sizes. 
You're talking level of talent. There's still the issue of a school having enough players even interested, let alone how good they are. St. Joseph's and Saltsburg would probably still forfeit the games they did this year.
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4565
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by konjo78 »

Birda hit the point exactly. Smaller size schools being in your level won't change schools only getting around 20-25 kids out.
User avatar
billmurray
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 915
Joined: December 2nd, 2012, 9:43 am
Location: Centre Hall
Contact:

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by billmurray »

No, I'm not talking talent level. I'm talking numbers. When you're a 1A school with 87 boys you MAY draw 20 to football...A 1A school with 175 boys may draw 35 boys. A team with 35 boys will be more conditioned/less fatigued than a team with 20 kids. They'll also be much better because they'll be able to hold full practices and have less chances of injuries depleting their roster. This is why several teams had forfeits this year, they got pounded by much stronger teams. With the new 6 classes they won't have to face such strong teams, they'll be on a more even playing field.
and Birda...how many Philly charter schools ran the table and won titles in the last 5 years? Here's a clue for you : ZERO. 2 Catholic schools have won a couple titles in 3A/4A in past 2 years...both classes that have zero affect on D6/5 football
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4565
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by konjo78 »

Im sorry bill, but what 2 schools might have a rematch in A title this year? Clairton and BG. What level will those teams be allowed to compete in next year do to their class size, A.


So if the majority of the best teams are still going to be A then that point you just wrote up is extremely wrong. They still will have to face tough teams and will get injuries no matter what.
peytonsaturday
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 857
Joined: October 17th, 2010, 9:30 pm

Re: Should the new A class in 6 classification be used for 7 man football?

Post by peytonsaturday »

Look at the local area and you need not look further.  Take Ferndale.  They're A this year.  They'll be A next year.  They play the likes of Portage and Berlin this year.  They'll still play Berlin and Portage next year.  Classification numbers mean little when you only have 20-30 kids on a team.  Even though Berlin and Portage will be A next year, they still have numbers in the high 40's maybe even high 50's.  Not a level playing field.  
Post Reply