D5 Playoffs

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by thebrigade »

bbsocceralumni wrote:
rainmaker wrote:They were locked into the 3 seed prior to the game whether they won or lost. Any chance they were resting him for the playoffs?
From looking at everything though, CT didn't have many offensive plays. Even if they were "saving" him, he still played defense the whole game. In the end, I don't like the idea of giving away a game the week before the playoffs, especially giving up the WestPac title that night too. That is just my opinion. I guess we will see Friday if their plan worked.
i guess it did work, and you know what funny bb, in your post about berlin not playing lv and taking the week off and resting your players you said that is the most important thing this time of the year with playoffs yet when its another team trying to get their players healthy for the playoff run its not good in your opinion.
bbsocceralumni
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 941
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 12:39 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by bbsocceralumni »

Brigade are you done yet? As for Berlin's purpose, the team is beat up. They needed it. What I was trying to say with CT is they won't rest their players when they play a weak team but will rest them against a good team? I felt that all the hard work CT players put in the regular season and to just lose the WestPac title the final week was kinda sad to be honest. Yes, I guess their plan worked out against Windber but they should of lost. Windber shot themselves in the foot 3 times in the redzone. Ct won though so that excuse doesn't matter. NBC is this week. I think CT will have their hands full.
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by thebrigade »

bbsocceralumni wrote:Brigade are you done yet? As for Berlin's purpose, the team is beat up. They needed it. What I was trying to say with CT is they won't rest their players when they play a weak team but will rest them against a good team? I felt that all the hard work CT players put in the regular season and to just lose the WestPac title the final week was kinda sad to be honest. Yes, I guess their plan worked out against Windber but they should of lost. Windber shot themselves in the foot 3 times in the redzone. Ct won though so that excuse doesn't matter. NBC is this week. I think CT will have their hands full.
you see again your a joke its comments like that that makes people hate you, are you seriously gonna take away the c.t defense holding 3 times in the red zone not on a 3 and out but 4 plays each time, and yet you forget c.t. mismanages the clock and halftime at the 3 yard line and throws away a scoring chance. i guess ridge threw away the game when berlin held them at the end with a batted down pass and a sack. you see you apply what you want to other teams that dont apply to berlin. 3 defensive stands that were all 4 downs and windber should have won, good observation.
bbsocceralumni
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 941
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 12:39 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by bbsocceralumni »

Observation of the game was that Windber moved the ball on CT. Other than Byers big run, CT didn't do much. Yes credit Ct's defense for holing them, but like I said Windber could of won.
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by thebrigade »

thebrigade wrote:
bbsocceralumni wrote:Brigade are you done yet? As for Berlin's purpose, the team is beat up. They needed it. What I was trying to say with CT is they won't rest their players when they play a weak team but will rest them against a good team? I felt that all the hard work CT players put in the regular season and to just lose the WestPac title the final week was kinda sad to be honest. Yes, I guess their plan worked out against Windber but they should of lost. Windber shot themselves in the foot 3 times in the redzone. Ct won though so that excuse doesn't matter. NBC is this week. I think CT will have their hands full.
you see again your a joke its comments like that that makes people hate you, are you seriously gonna take away the c.t defense holding 3 times in the red zone not on a 3 and out but 4 plays each time, and yet you forget c.t. mismanages the clock and halftime at the 3 yard line and throws away a scoring chance. i guess ridge threw away the game when berlin held them at the end with a batted down pass and a sack. you see you apply what you want to other teams that dont apply to berlin. 3 defensive stands that were all 4 downs and windber should have won, good observation. and you made a comment to waterbug about nothing but morons on here.. you sir are the biggest, its really good that you are able to make predictions on here with teams that are 6-0 going up against 1-5 but when it actually come down to analysis you have no idea what the game is about, the heart it takes to play on a winless team, to go out each week in the rain, snow, cold, heat to come home every day with bruises from head to toe, barely able to undress to get in a take a warm/hot shower and hit the bed without eating because you have just given an entire day of 110% effort so that when the year is over and the playoffs start you can hold a team 3 times in the redzone and move on to the next round only to have a moron/idiot like you take my criticism of you and apply it to a team that just played another team that both played their hearts out with a belittling statement that they will be manhandled, you sir are a donkeys rear.
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by thebrigade »

bbsocceralumni wrote:Observation of the game was that Windber moved the ball on CT. Other than Byers big run, CT didn't do much. Yes credit Ct's defense for holing them, but like I said Windber could of won.
no sir you are a donkeys rearend, you said they should have, not could have.
bbsocceralumni
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 941
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 12:39 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by bbsocceralumni »

Bring out the tough words now. Since when is coulda/shoulda not the same?
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by thebrigade »

bbsocceralumni wrote:Bring out the tough words now. Since when is coulda/shoulda not the same?
no sir it is not the same. not even close. saying c.t. could have beat portage last year had they not ran the clock down each play, versus c.t. should have won that game against portage are so far apart its not even funny. and for you to even try that shows how your trying to get out of a statement in which you made. ok mr. president did you have sex with that woman monica lewinsky,, no i didn not have sex with that women monica lewinsky. go ahead and try and make it a play on words, you dissed a team that played a great team. as i posted the other day it was a shame one of them had to lose, but you just diss them like they played a crappy team and won 7-6 and again.. you make the statement above that berlin was injured and needed the rest, well let me tell you c.t has had 4 kids out with concussions the last month and they needed the rest just as much. quit making everything berlin does as justified and ok and when another team does it they are just throwing away a co-champ westpac title. little that would have done if c.t had lost friday and their season was over, but if thats ok in your eyes so be it
bbsocceralumni
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 941
Joined: September 23rd, 2008, 12:39 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by bbsocceralumni »

You are out of control man. Seriously. You are getting so worked up and I'm laughing my ash off at you. I have fun on these forums. What are you really trying to prove? I'm done wasting my time on here for a pointless argument.
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: D5 Playoffs

Post by thebrigade »

bbsocceralumni wrote:You are out of control man. Seriously. You are getting so worked up and I'm laughing my ash off at you. I have fun on these forums. What are you really trying to prove? I'm done wasting my time on here for a pointless argument.
you see thats what you do on here you argue with people, belittle them, try to throw made up facts, and when someone finally calls you out and points outs everything you said, your response is finally relax, i am just having fun or i was joking you make observations that are ridiculous and try to cover it up with arent they the same words. that field was a mess and both teams played a hell of a game yet you pick out that c.t was unimpressive on offense, maybe windber just played a hell of a defensive game but you wouldnt know that from jack. i am laughing my ash off at you for your idiotic responses to what i say and each time i catch you how you try to lie your way out of it.. so lets see if you lie again and respond to this "in your words pointless argument".
Post Reply