Page 2 of 2

Re: Why not try something new?

Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 12:38 pm
by KirkHerbstreit
El-Moldo wrote:I already know what I need to know about Pitt. I do, however, enjoy informing the Nits about their school though.
Just like 7UP!

Re: Why not try something new?

Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 5:39 pm
by El-Moldo
Light and refreshing. Maybe YOU should lighten up a little.

Re: Why not try something new?

Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 9:31 pm
by KirkHerbstreit
Case Closed!

Re: Why not try something new?

Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 9:39 pm
by El-Moldo
Case of 7UP, closed???? The Uncola???? I'll believe it when I see it the next time someone brings up something about Penn State. Can Herb resist an Uncola response?

Re: Why not try something new?

Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 10:11 pm
by KirkHerbstreit
haha you still don't get it. You are so blinded by your hate for Penn State that you don't even realize that your theory about the "uncola" is exactly what you do on a weekly basis with your posts about Penn State. It's just a bad example.

If as a Pirate fan, I went to a messageboard and made fun of the Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies, etc. attendance or how they handled their baseball operation I would fully expect them to laugh in my face or diss the Pirates in return. If I did it on a weekly basis, Id think it's probably because i wish my team was like theirs. I wouldnt think they were trying to make their team look better by ripping mine. They wouldnt need to defend their team to me, because compared to them my team is a piece of crap. Sound familiar?

Re: Why not try something new?

Posted: November 2nd, 2011, 11:34 pm
by El-Moldo
If I start a topic on why Penn State's attendance is down at Beaver Stadium, THAT IS NOT THE UNCOLA. It is conversation. BUT when YOU respond to this topic by bringing up Pitt (for what reason I don't know, since Pitt has NOTHING to do with PSU attendance) in your DEFENSE of poor Penn State attendance, then THAT is the UNCOLA. WHY bring Pitt into a topic when it deals with Penn State? Clear enough for you?