Page 2 of 2
Re: CFP committee
Posted: January 14th, 2017, 12:04 pm
by konjo78
They fit 4 of the 5. More than penn state or mich did if you really want to argue it.
Re: CFP committee
Posted: January 14th, 2017, 12:11 pm
by GoldenRamsFAN
The only 1 I see them fitting is your number 2...I would say USC would have been more interesting to watch then either Washington or OSU
Re: CFP committee
Posted: January 14th, 2017, 1:22 pm
by konjo78
Washington played plenty of top 25 teams and won in blowouts.
Usc is only a topic because they ended the year strong but no way deserved a top 4 appearance.
Re: CFP committee
Posted: January 14th, 2017, 1:28 pm
by GoldenRamsFAN
Plenty? I have USC and Colorado
Re: CFP committee
Posted: January 14th, 2017, 1:54 pm
by konjo78
Stanford? Wash state was ranked at the time. Utah?
Re: CFP committee
Posted: January 14th, 2017, 2:02 pm
by GoldenRamsFAN
Ok at the time Stanford wasn't and wash st was 8-5...
Re: CFP committee
Posted: January 14th, 2017, 2:20 pm
by bigrig15
USC is the only one that should be somewhat considered but they lost to bama by 50 so they got it rightÂ