Posted: May 13th, 2004, 4:57 pm
John Kerry admitted to taking part in the burning of villages and randomly firing a 50 cal (pretty big gun for those of you not familiar) into a no-fire zone. Yet, this hypocrite will stand along side his fellow liberal dems and condem what the soldiers in Iraq did. Why? Because he is making this political at the expense of our troops. It's absurd. I refuse to condem John Kerry for what he did in Vietnam (I'm not saying it was right either) because I wasn't there. I also refuse to condem what happened in Iraq. I do condem John Kerry for using this for a political advantage. Why was it so easy to find media outlets for the likes of Kerry, Kennedy, Polosi and Murtha when the prisoner issue came to light, but so difficult for these same people to find media outlets when Berg was brutally slaughtered?
I think we all need to keep Sivits and the others in our prayers. We weren't there, so please don't condem them.
And Coveman - you sounded happy about Hyndman, PA being on the national news. Is this really the type of national media coverage you want for our area? I'm not trying to be confrontational here, I just didn't understand your post.
I think we all need to keep Sivits and the others in our prayers. We weren't there, so please don't condem them.
And Coveman - you sounded happy about Hyndman, PA being on the national news. Is this really the type of national media coverage you want for our area? I'm not trying to be confrontational here, I just didn't understand your post.