Page 2 of 2
Posted: March 29th, 2006, 5:20 pm
by Gunner18
Ham's behavior is tolerated because he has been around the block here and all the moderators/admin know him and his character, which is why we allow him a little more "breathing" room than the new guys. you on the other hand have no background with any of us, our first impression of you is that of a trouble maker, now if you would have come on here and "tested" the waters and gone with the flow for awhile before going off on people then things would be different.
Re: LHAC Basketball 2005
Posted: March 29th, 2006, 6:04 pm
by Pale Rider
See if this analogy fits.
Some years ago, I worked for a company that had part of its sales force in a small, 3 man office. One person was the "lead" sales, the other two under the first's lead. During my time over a few years, this "lead" salesman must have gone through 6 or 7 assistants, including myself. After considerable time, I asked for a transfer out of that office also, like the others before me. The man thought his way, about anything, was the only way. Didn't matter what. Bully pulpit. Control Freak. Thinks he knows it all, and he's better than all the rest. Does this look like any recent post'er on this board? You be the Judge.
Re: LHAC Basketball 2005
Posted: March 29th, 2006, 6:09 pm
by vman
Gnr., "our first impression of you is that of a trouble maker," now is that a collective decision or just your impression! Admittedly, I may have a taunting, I don't give a F' nature. But you have to remember one of the very favorite "sports" on this board is BM bashing; and nearly every topic I've entered I have been significantly out numbered but in all - I was never the one to throw the first "shot". People just didn't/ dont like to hear BM defended. Obviously I am not afraid to stand up for or express what I believe in. I believe that you will state otherwise, but your judgment of me as a "trouble maker" is weighted by your stance on the main issue that I defend. Like so many others on this board you have a problem with BM and therefore with me. So I think all of your "if I had tested the waters" is bs. You defend the character of this acting like a punk kid yet label me a trouble maker???Let me know when I earn "breathing room" so I can tell you how I really feel. Have a nice day.
Re: LHAC Basketball 2005
Posted: March 29th, 2006, 6:32 pm
by Pale Rider
...."Some men you JUST CAN'T reach!"......
Re: LHAC Basketball 2005
Posted: March 29th, 2006, 6:48 pm
by flybynight
[quote="vman";p="120752"]Gnr., "our first impression of you is that of a trouble maker," now is that a collective decision or just your impression! Admittedly, I may have a taunting, I don't give a F' nature. But you have to remember one of the very favorite "sports" on this board is BM bashing; and nearly every topic I've entered I have been significantly out numbered but in all - I was never the one to throw the first "shot". People just didn't/ dont like to hear BM defended. Obviously I am not afraid to stand up for or express what I believe in. I believe that you will state otherwise, but your judgment of me as a "trouble maker" is weighted by your stance on the main issue that I defend. Like so many others on this board you have a problem with BM and therefore with me. So I think all of your "if I had tested the waters" is bs. You defend the character of this acting like a punk kid yet label me a trouble maker???Let me know when I earn "breathing room" so I can tell you how I really feel. Have a nice day.[/quote]
What purpose does it serve you to come onto this bored and make malicious remarks to people who really know what they are talking about, while you have trouble producing little if any content or fact at all. You intended to start trouble on here when you registered. This is just my opinion, but either get off your high horse and gain some respect, or maybe you should find another forum to spread your malice.
Posted: March 29th, 2006, 6:52 pm
by Gunner18
vman, do you want me to re-quote your post where you personally said that you were allowed to sherrif the place and who died and made me God of the board?
put yourself in the shoes of a moderator now. your the authority of a message board, you see someone stirring the pot, you inform that person of the consequences of going too far and all of a sudden they say that they can sherrif the place all they want and then they question your authority? what kind of first impression does that give? I dont know the opinions of the other moderators becuase they have not expressed them, i doubt any of them have even read this thread. But I do know how most of them think, generally, so it doesn't really matter.
finally..
Like so many others on this board you have a problem with BM and therefore with me.
As a matter of fact i have several friends that attended McCort and I even traveled the 40 miles from Bedford on several occasions just to watch a McCort sporting event (vs a school other than Bedford). Honestly I don't really see why I would have a problem with McCort either, it's not like they dominate the sports scene, yes they are very good in most sports, but look at their trophy cabinent. ESPECIALLY football, the sport most people have a problem with, sure they may beat my Bisons alot, but how often have they won the Conference/district? So you see, I really don't have much, if any, beef with McCort. I just don't like seeing new guys thinking they can "sheriff" the place.
Re: LHAC Basketball 2005
Posted: March 30th, 2006, 10:48 am
by vman
Gnr., I appreciate the feedback and PM... Re. the sherrifing quote, if you followed earlier topics I was engaged in, it was in reference to a single issue/debate: public vs private. Then "stirring the pot"?? I believe this is a misconstrued conception; that is: I view myself as someone standing up for someone/something they believe in. I am obviously out numbered; but you know what...I heard the voice of the Lord say "Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said "Here I am, send me!"...even Pale won't get it...speaking of Pale: was your parable a commentary on your difficulties holding down a job or was the moral of that "judge not yet ye be judged??
Now Fbn, Do you know the meaning of malicious and hypocrisy? You claim I address "people who really know what they are talking about"; well, risking redundancy, I've stated several times that in the past 2 yrs. I've seen numerous occasions when BM is erroneously attacked in (borrowing one of your words) malicious fashion and people like being unchecked/unchallenged! Some people who run mouth regardless of factual content of their point do not like to be challenged! And some people on this board have problems with basic rights like freedom of choice and speech! Then your accusation" You intended to start trouble on here when you registered." Totally false!!! Look @ this very topic - I stuck to hoops but thennn; I'm disrespected and lectured??? I could give you lectures of learned Discipline, Honor and Respect but I do not feel like this is the forum!
Posted: March 30th, 2006, 2:38 pm
by Gunner18
This topic (argument with vman, myself and others) is now locked and any attempt to revive it through a new topic shall be shut down and appropriate action taken. (this applies to EVERYONE, not just vman)