District 6 Eligibility
Re: District 6 Eligibility
The PIAA has consistently overturned the WPIAL rulings regarding player participation and almost always sides with the player.
Without praise or malice to v-man's legal abilities, I suspect the District 6 decision will be overturned.
Without praise or malice to v-man's legal abilities, I suspect the District 6 decision will be overturned.
- The Ancient Enemy
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 7549
- Joined: October 30th, 2004, 2:47 pm
Re: District 6 Eligibility
I gotta side with Xylo on this, at the end of the day we all know Wadley will be playing football.
"I can and will be hard anytime with or without my boyz!!!" - Hollywood
"Their jerseys make me want to run through the desert and tackle a terrorist." - nLions1
"Their jerseys make me want to run through the desert and tackle a terrorist." - nLions1
Re: District 6 Eligibility
Hey Xy,
I was not consulted for legal abilities by any means! But I have become rather familiar with PIAA rules & rulings in recent weeks! With that said I am not as sure of AW being sided with @ the state level, as you & TAE seem to be!
I was not consulted for legal abilities by any means! But I have become rather familiar with PIAA rules & rulings in recent weeks! With that said I am not as sure of AW being sided with @ the state level, as you & TAE seem to be!
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
-
hilltoppanther
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 399
- Joined: August 19th, 2005, 10:15 am
Re: District 6 Eligibility
Hill'panther,
If you happen to be who I suspect you may be, that is a very classy response and keeps focus where it should be: looking after the best interest of the young person involved!
As I stated in the KH situation I, personally, was all for that kid getting another year, he did not know he rules, nor did he make those choices(repeating a grade or not) when he was like 11, 12 yrs old!
And I will wait to see how AWs case plays out. All I will say now is that there are some ironic twist involved that must wait till post hearing but again I believe your priorities are in the correct perspective!
If you happen to be who I suspect you may be, that is a very classy response and keeps focus where it should be: looking after the best interest of the young person involved!
As I stated in the KH situation I, personally, was all for that kid getting another year, he did not know he rules, nor did he make those choices(repeating a grade or not) when he was like 11, 12 yrs old!
And I will wait to see how AWs case plays out. All I will say now is that there are some ironic twist involved that must wait till post hearing but again I believe your priorities are in the correct perspective!
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
I don't know the kid or why he failed 9th grade. But if there were no special circumstances concerning his repeating 9th grade I can't see why the state would allow him to have an extra year. It could really open up a can of worms. If there were special circumstances then I agree with hilltoppanther to "Let him play".
Question for those that know....I do not know the young man in question, other than by name....I believe I read an article this spring saying he was a stud in track, but was ineligible to participate? Is that correct? I apologize if I have the story incorrect....just trying to remember what I read...something about a top athlete not competing....thanks...
-
hilltoppanther
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 399
- Joined: August 19th, 2005, 10:15 am
Re: District 6 Eligibility
My understanding is that you can do the same sport for six seasons ( four at the varsity level) and no more...If you go through grades 7-12 using the seven year plan(as long as your age stays fine)..Don't play the sport of choice both years you are repeating a grade. Take a year off somewhere along the line or choose another sport for a year or something.
-
hilltoppanther
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 399
- Joined: August 19th, 2005, 10:15 am
Approximately 9 years ago, the PIAA changed the eligibility form. The rule prior to 1998 read that a student had 8 semesters from grades 9-12 in which to compete in interscholastic sports.
The rule from 1999 now reads that a student has 12 semesters from grades 7-12 in which to compete in interscholastic sports.
The rule from 1999 now reads that a student has 12 semesters from grades 7-12 in which to compete in interscholastic sports.


