District 6 Eligibility

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
Xylo
Junior
Junior
Posts: 128
Joined: October 8th, 2004, 8:15 am

Re: District 6 Eligibility

Post by Xylo »

The PIAA has consistently overturned the WPIAL rulings regarding player participation and almost always sides with the player.

Without praise or malice to v-man's legal abilities, I suspect the District 6 decision will be overturned.
User avatar
The Ancient Enemy
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 7549
Joined: October 30th, 2004, 2:47 pm

Re: District 6 Eligibility

Post by The Ancient Enemy »

I gotta side with Xylo on this, at the end of the day we all know Wadley will be playing football.
"I can and will be hard anytime with or without my boyz!!!" - Hollywood

"Their jerseys make me want to run through the desert and tackle a terrorist." - nLions1
vman
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2782
Joined: February 20th, 2006, 11:40 am

Re: District 6 Eligibility

Post by vman »

Hey Xy,

I was not consulted for legal abilities by any means! But I have become rather familiar with PIAA rules & rulings in recent weeks! With that said I am not as sure of AW being sided with @ the state level, as you & TAE seem to be!
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
hilltoppanther
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 399
Joined: August 19th, 2005, 10:15 am

Post by hilltoppanther »

Let him play
vman
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2782
Joined: February 20th, 2006, 11:40 am

Re: District 6 Eligibility

Post by vman »

Hill'panther,

If you happen to be who I suspect you may be, that is a very classy response and keeps focus where it should be: looking after the best interest of the young person involved!

As I stated in the KH situation I, personally, was all for that kid getting another year, he did not know he rules, nor did he make those choices(repeating a grade or not) when he was like 11, 12 yrs old!

And I will wait to see how AWs case plays out. All I will say now is that there are some ironic twist involved that must wait till post hearing but again I believe your priorities are in the correct perspective!
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
TBone
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 217
Joined: November 16th, 2004, 12:03 pm

Post by TBone »

I don't know the kid or why he failed 9th grade. But if there were no special circumstances concerning his repeating 9th grade I can't see why the state would allow him to have an extra year. It could really open up a can of worms. If there were special circumstances then I agree with hilltoppanther to "Let him play".
longball5
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 418
Joined: January 18th, 2004, 2:46 pm

Post by longball5 »

Question for those that know....I do not know the young man in question, other than by name....I believe I read an article this spring saying he was a stud in track, but was ineligible to participate? Is that correct? I apologize if I have the story incorrect....just trying to remember what I read...something about a top athlete not competing....thanks...
hilltoppanther
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 399
Joined: August 19th, 2005, 10:15 am

Post by hilltoppanther »

The only thing the PIAA has to watch in this one is that they will open the door for other athletes to fail a grade in order to get an extra year.

My only argument, is that the young man did not lose a year of athletics, so why the appeal for an extra year?
Sneakers
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 1247
Joined: August 23rd, 2003, 5:04 pm

Re: District 6 Eligibility

Post by Sneakers »

My understanding is that you can do the same sport for six seasons ( four at the varsity level) and no more...If you go through grades 7-12 using the seven year plan(as long as your age stays fine)..Don't play the sport of choice both years you are repeating a grade. Take a year off somewhere along the line or choose another sport for a year or something.
hilltoppanther
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 399
Joined: August 19th, 2005, 10:15 am

Post by hilltoppanther »

Approximately 9 years ago, the PIAA changed the eligibility form. The rule prior to 1998 read that a student had 8 semesters from grades 9-12 in which to compete in interscholastic sports.

The rule from 1999 now reads that a student has 12 semesters from grades 7-12 in which to compete in interscholastic sports.
Post Reply