Rams vs. Crushers
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Yes and I agree with you also, but unless something drastic happens it is my prediction, not like im trying to hate on McCort even, there a solid program currently. I just think like all things, the W's will start decreasing dramtically in the future (as in the next 2-3 years not this season)
vman thanks for the injury update, I am sure at this time every team has some bumps and bruises, It is just esp. bad for a team like Richland to not have their senior, returning reception/yard leader(yes better stats than ripple last year i Believe), although I am not saying it would have made a difference. Heck the backup recievers made big plays too so who knows the game might been different in a bad way. On that note, did anyone see that Lateral by Ripple? good stuff.
vman thanks for the injury update, I am sure at this time every team has some bumps and bruises, It is just esp. bad for a team like Richland to not have their senior, returning reception/yard leader(yes better stats than ripple last year i Believe), although I am not saying it would have made a difference. Heck the backup recievers made big plays too so who knows the game might been different in a bad way. On that note, did anyone see that Lateral by Ripple? good stuff.
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
you mean the forward lateral not called by the Richland errr, neutral referees?
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Lol your classic Vman, truly...
-
kingdomofcrush07
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 422
- Joined: September 6th, 2007, 6:26 pm
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
were u able to tell that it was forward at the game or did u discern that in one of your conspiracy sessions where you examine each official and every call they make so you can report how many have FH ties
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Well ty...it isn't easy being me, honestly!pats39 wrote:Lol your classic Vman, truly...
Actually play was almost directly in front of me, I was on sidelines and a couple nearby, knowledgeable fans also saw it, clearly a forward lateral.....did have copy of game tape & reviewed next morn...NO DOUBT forward lateral....and no conspiracy session needed, it was a Richland crew, believe me Don jr has learned some things well from daddy!! But hey, no excuses, when you are a top dog and w/ all those Haters out there you get used to no calls & @ times playing against the zebras. Early in game in a first & goal situation, a phantom holding flag, then later in 2nd qtr., on a 3rd & goal, BM scored on like a 7 yd run.....late flag, ref explained that wing back, who motions on nearly every play, was not set a like a full second prior to motioning...I heard his explanation to the BM coaches "he's been doing it all game"...WTF, they had not called it all game but after a td run on 3rd & goal a late hanky comes out?? that was a huge call as McCort did not convert 3rd & more than 10 & settled for a fg.......It isn't easy being a Crusher either but adversity makes one tougher!kingdomofcrush07 wrote:were u able to tell that it was forward at the game or did u discern that in one of your conspiracy sessions
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
-
Dfense wins games
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 1401
- Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 10:17 pm
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
First off, BMs program is going up, not down. Theres no way us BM fans have let you forgotten about the past 7 yrs, let alone the past two!
Again, the comment about the 7th and 8th graders. Patsy, give up on it! YES, RICHLAND BEAT BM in 7th and 8th grade (whos 4 best kids moved up to 9th), but they didnt at the Varsity level and they didnt at the Freshman level either (BTW, another Rugg on the team was out with an injury and that Freshman team has less than 13 players on it, 17 if you count the 4 8th graders. Its ok though! the classes after them as near 30 each) The program isnt goin anywhere but up! Again, if you really want to talk about 13 yr olds go for it! Becuase thats what people in Richland do, hold on to the past and hope for the future. Im goin to learn from my past, play in the present and plan for the future
Again, the comment about the 7th and 8th graders. Patsy, give up on it! YES, RICHLAND BEAT BM in 7th and 8th grade (whos 4 best kids moved up to 9th), but they didnt at the Varsity level and they didnt at the Freshman level either (BTW, another Rugg on the team was out with an injury and that Freshman team has less than 13 players on it, 17 if you count the 4 8th graders. Its ok though! the classes after them as near 30 each) The program isnt goin anywhere but up! Again, if you really want to talk about 13 yr olds go for it! Becuase thats what people in Richland do, hold on to the past and hope for the future. Im goin to learn from my past, play in the present and plan for the future
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Man DWG, you sure full of cliches arent u. Presently McCort is at its peak, where do you really see them going DWG, state championships, highly highly unlikely. Don't get all defensive I am sure your a great coach, but if u had a 7th and 8th grade team 3-4 years ago, you can not sit there and tell me that they wouldn't be 10x better than the current McCort 7th and 8th teams and def. would never lose to Richland of all teams.
-
x3ncroyle1236x3
- Freshman

- Posts: 24
- Joined: October 1st, 2008, 9:53 am
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
someone please enlighten me... and tell me how richland lost to westmont last week?
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Maybe it was those awful uniforms they wore. I have never seen anything so ugly!! Or maybe it is because they have no game other than passing. What were their passing stats in the Somerset game?? I think they threw like 40+ times and they killed the team 42-0. They are not that good. Look at their record.
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Richland isn't awful...they just need a running game. They are unbalanced. Their coach is a throw first type of guy.