Posted: November 17th, 2005, 8:14 pm
HR youre the man, i know we've had our differences, but youre the man. love ya! :lol:
BleacherCoaches.com
The Home of Pennsylvania High School Sports!
https://www.bleachercoaches.com/
Tussey Won !!!
Page 11 of 11
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 12:03 am
Why wouldn't D-6 want to keep Bedford though, and add an easy W in CR? Bedford has so many rivalries in that area already, to lose that because of a change in the system would be insane. The D-5 people really need to realize that it would be best for this to happen, and would create the level playing that everybody is desiring. The entry rules to the playoffs would be plain and laid out, no discrepancy as to who would enter or not. Everybody would get to play thier rivals in this new format, as most of the ICC teams are from D5/6. This is the way it should be.
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 9:35 am
Once again Roadie thanks for clearing the air. So I guess if it ever comes down to that then Bedford and Ridge are screwed because I don't think D6 ever really wanted us in their show in the first place. I know my opinion is biased on this but ever since they joined the LHAC Bedford has gotten hosed by D6 officials so many times I've lost count.
Re: Tussey Won !!!
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 10:28 am
The big game is tonight, but here's how it went down last week.
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 12:56 pm
It all ends tonight as well. Sorry.
Re: Tussey Won !!!
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 4:26 pm
In reply to Ham's comments:
Why wouldn't D-6 want to keep Bedford though, and add an easy W in CR?
I'm not saying they wouldn't for sure, but as I outlined above their has been talk of them "stranding" District 5 if they go to sectionalization because D5 won't go along with some things that would be beneficial to D6.
Bedford has so many rivalries in that area already, to lose that because of a change in the system would be insane. The D-5 people really need to realize that it would be best for this to happen, and would create the level playing that everybody is desiring.
Well Ham, D5 Voted "YES" to a sectionalization plan developed by Bellwood Coach/AD John Hayes in about '94 or '95. D6 Voted "NO". It was to involve both Districts subregionalizing together.
Why wouldn't D-6 want to keep Bedford though, and add an easy W in CR?
I'm not saying they wouldn't for sure, but as I outlined above their has been talk of them "stranding" District 5 if they go to sectionalization because D5 won't go along with some things that would be beneficial to D6.
Bedford has so many rivalries in that area already, to lose that because of a change in the system would be insane. The D-5 people really need to realize that it would be best for this to happen, and would create the level playing that everybody is desiring.
Well Ham, D5 Voted "YES" to a sectionalization plan developed by Bellwood Coach/AD John Hayes in about '94 or '95. D6 Voted "NO". It was to involve both Districts subregionalizing together.
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 10:24 pm
who won the tussy windber game
Re: Tussey Won !!!
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 10:29 pm
don't know last i heard winber was winning :!:
Re: Tussey Won !!!
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 10:34 pm
Windber won 42-7..
Re: Tussey Won !!!
Posted: November 18th, 2005, 11:53 pm
WINDBER will play the W.P.I.A.L. Champ next week. Either Rochester or Duquesne at a site~ date~ & time T.B.A. I'm hoping somewhere like I.U.P.
"THE CHOPS".
:roll:
"THE CHOPS".
:roll: