No New taxes
-
Former Wildcat
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 571
- Joined: February 23rd, 2004, 11:35 am
Re: No New taxes
Just a point about Ridge Dad's post. He states as a fact that Obama has voted to raise taxes 94 times. Just because McCain says something does not make it a fact. Check factcheck.org to see the facts behind this and other false claims by both candidates. I would assume that other "facts" presented by Ridge Dad are similar. I find that both conservatives and liberals like to quote such "facts". Just keeping it real.
Last edited by Former Wildcat on September 20th, 2011, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: No New taxes
Please point to where I said that.......Former Wildcat wrote:Just a point about Ridge Dad's post. He states as a fact that Obama has voted to raise taxes 94 times. Just because McCain says something does not make it a fact. Check factcheck.org to see the facts behind this and other false claims by both candidates. I would assume that other "facts" presented by Ridge Dad are similar. I find that both conservatives and liberals like to quote such "facts". Just keeping it real.
Then before you make false accusations, learn to make sure you got YOUR facts straight.
Also, don't assume without backing it up. List the other facts I put out there that are not correct.
Last edited by RidgeDad on September 20th, 2011, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Former Wildcat
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 571
- Joined: February 23rd, 2004, 11:35 am
Re: No New taxes
Wow! No need to get so upset. I don't think I even gave any facts except to refute one of yours. You made this statement: "Obama Voted At Least 94 Times For Higher Taxes In The U.S. Senate." This is false. McCain has stated this numerous times and factcheck.org has called him on it each time. Here is the truth about the 94 votes.
"Twenty-three were for measures that would have produced no tax increase at all; they were against proposed tax cuts.
Seven of the votes were in favor of measures that would have lowered taxes for many, while raising them on a relative few, either corporations or affluent individuals.
Eleven votes the GOP is counting would have increased taxes on those making more than $1 million a year – in order to fund programs such as Head Start and school nutrition programs, or veterans’ health care.
The GOP sometimes counted two, three and even four votes on the same measure. We found their tally included a total of 17 votes on seven measures, effectively padding their total by 10.
The majority of the 94 votes – 53 of them, including some mentioned above – were on budget measures, not tax bills, and would not have resulted in any tax change. Four other votes were non-binding motions related to conference report negotiations."
Don't get fired up at me about politics. My main interest in politics is how blinded both liberals and conservatives get by the propaganda of their own party and candidates. Often what is presented as "fact" is truly just spin.
"Twenty-three were for measures that would have produced no tax increase at all; they were against proposed tax cuts.
Seven of the votes were in favor of measures that would have lowered taxes for many, while raising them on a relative few, either corporations or affluent individuals.
Eleven votes the GOP is counting would have increased taxes on those making more than $1 million a year – in order to fund programs such as Head Start and school nutrition programs, or veterans’ health care.
The GOP sometimes counted two, three and even four votes on the same measure. We found their tally included a total of 17 votes on seven measures, effectively padding their total by 10.
The majority of the 94 votes – 53 of them, including some mentioned above – were on budget measures, not tax bills, and would not have resulted in any tax change. Four other votes were non-binding motions related to conference report negotiations."
Don't get fired up at me about politics. My main interest in politics is how blinded both liberals and conservatives get by the propaganda of their own party and candidates. Often what is presented as "fact" is truly just spin.
Last edited by Former Wildcat on September 20th, 2011, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
deliverance
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 4036
- Joined: August 27th, 2003, 6:23 pm
Re: No New taxes
I agree with Former Wildcat's view on Politics. Now if I could only turn him into a Texas fan instead of Ohio State :lol: .
Last edited by deliverance on September 20th, 2011, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: No New taxes
Hey Sherlock - you need a new magnifying glass.Former Wildcat wrote:Wow! No need to get so upset. I don't think I even gave any facts except to refute one of yours. You made this statement: "Obama Voted At Least 94 Times For Higher Taxes In The U.S. Senate." This is false. McCain has stated this numerous times and factcheck.org has called him on it each time. Here is the truth about the 94 votes.
"Twenty-three were for measures that would have produced no tax increase at all; they were against proposed tax cuts.
Seven of the votes were in favor of measures that would have lowered taxes for many, while raising them on a relative few, either corporations or affluent individuals.
Eleven votes the GOP is counting would have increased taxes on those making more than $1 million a year – in order to fund programs such as Head Start and school nutrition programs, or veterans’ health care.
The GOP sometimes counted two, three and even four votes on the same measure. We found their tally included a total of 17 votes on seven measures, effectively padding their total by 10.
The majority of the 94 votes – 53 of them, including some mentioned above – were on budget measures, not tax bills, and would not have resulted in any tax change. Four other votes were non-binding motions related to conference report negotiations."
Don't get fired up at me about politics. My main interest in politics is how blinded both liberals and conservatives get by the propaganda of their own party and candidates. Often what is presented as "fact" is truly just spin.
vman said that - not I.
Last edited by RidgeDad on September 20th, 2011, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: No New taxes
This is for Former Widcat's viewing pleasure.vman wrote:"I do agree with you that he may increase some taxes".....Look at his voting record...he is what he is a tax & spend socialist....Obama’s transformation, if you go by his campaign so far, would mean higher income taxes, higher Social Security taxes, higher investment taxes, higher corporate taxes, massive new domestic spending, and a healthcare plan that perhaps could be the next step to a full-scale, single-payer system. Is that what most Americans want, someone who will fulfill a Democratic policy wish list? And here's a quote from BHO "Obama: “What we ought to tax is dirty energy, like coal and, to a lesser extent, natural gas"...great just what we need headin ginto winter higher fuel, electricity & heating bills!! Obama Voted At Least 94 Times For Higher Taxes In The U.S. Senate....some more facts:deliverance wrote:I do agree with you that he may increase some taxes, but I still feel he is better served for our country than Mr. McCain. It's looking like we may find out. I just really hope you're wrong because this country can't afford to get much worse.
To Date, Obama Has Voted For A Tax Increase Approximately Once Every Five Days Congress Has Been In Session.
Obama Voted At Least 12 Times For Higher Income Taxes.
Obama Voted Against Marriage Penalty Relief At Least Twice.
Obama Voted Against Extending The Expanded Child Tax Credit.
Obama Voted At Least 3 Times Against Repealing The 1993 Income Tax Increase On Social Security Benefits.
Obama Has Voted At Least 5 Times Against Providing Relief From The Alternative Minimum Tax.
Obama Has Voted At Least 7 Times Against Tax Incentives Benefiting Small Business.
Obama Voted Against Capital Gains Tax Cuts At Least 9 Times.
Obama Voted Against Tax Cuts On Dividend Income At Least 9 Times.
OBAMA ALSO SUPPORTED HUNDREDS OF TAX INCREASES IN THE STATE SENATE
In The State Senate, Obama Supported “Hundreds Of Tax Increases.” ABC’s Terry Moran: “[O]bama was considered a reliable liberal Democratic vote in Illinois. For instance, voting for most gun control measures, opposing efforts to ban so-called partial birth abortions and supporting hundreds of tax increases.”
In 2004, Obama Voted For A $304 Million Tax Increase On Businesses In Creating The Tax Shelter Voluntary Compliance Act. (H.B. 848, Illinois Senate Floor Third Reading, Passed 30-28-1, 5/20/04, Obama Voted Yea; Dave McKinney, “Blagojevich Threatens Up To 5,000 State Layoffs,” Chicago Sun-Times, 5/21/04)
* The Legislation “Triggered A Huge Outcry From Business Groups,” Which Contended It Would “Drive Companies Out Of State” And Cost Jobs. “The governor's bid to raise taxes and fees by close to $400 million and reel in another $300 million-plus in corporate tax breaks has triggered a huge outcry from business groups, which contend the moves will drive companies out of state and cause Illinois to lose jobs.”
In 2003, Obama Voted For A Bill “That Raised A Huge Number Of Fees And Taxes” On Businesses And Licenses. “Obama voted for a bill during the 2003 Illinois General Assembly legislative session that raised a huge number of fees and taxes for businesses and licenses to cover day-to-day expenses of state government.”
* The Legislation Negatively Impacted Illinois’ Trucking Industry, Costing The State 25,000 Licensed Trucks In 2005. “Almost 17,000 fewer commercial trucks and 2,700 fewer trucking companies have been registered in Illinois for 2005, fueling the trucking industry's claim that Gov. Rod Blagojevich is driving businesses out of the state with his new fees and business taxes.” (Brian Wallheimer, “Governor's New Fees Are Driving Trucking Firms Out Of Illinois, Industry Says,” St. Louis Post- Dispatch, 5/5/04)
In 2003, Obama Voted To Tax Natural Gas Purchased Outside Of Illinois.
* The Natural Gas Tax Made Natural Gas More Expensive For Industrial Buyers Such As Manufacturers. “The natural gas tax. A new policy under Blagojevich’s budget will make natural gas more expensive to industrial buyers. Currently, Illinois offers an exemption on the sales tax paid for natural gas, but the new budget ends that exemption, a move that could become a major expense for steel mills and other factories that use large quantities of natural gas.”
* Obama Voted For The Natural Gas Tax, Which Threatened Jobs, At The Same Time That Illinois Was Leading The Nation In Jobs Lost. “Just as harmful to the state’s economy are the large taxes on natural gas brought from out-of-state suppliers and the rolling stock sales tax. Both of these taxes will negatively affect important businesses as well as the employees who are dependent on these Illinois companies. I have received phone calls and letters from all sectors of the business community who reported that the projected loss of revenues due to these increased taxes and fees may well cause them to close their facilities in Illinois and move to a more business-friendly surrounding state while still serving Illinois customers. Illinois leads the nation in jobs lost. We cannot afford to drive more businesses from our state.”
In 1999, Obama Voted In Favor Of S.B. 1028 To Create The Illinois First Infrastructure Program, Which Raised 146 Taxes And Fees. (S.B. 1028: Senate Floor Third Reading, Passed, 58-0-0, 3/23/99, Obama Voted Yea; S.B. 1028: Senate Conference Committee Report, Passed, 42-17-0, 5/21/99, Obama Voted Yea; Editorial, “Jack Ryan Woefully Unprepared For Attack On Obama,”
OBAMA’S TAX, SPENDING AND BUSINESS INTEREST GROUP RATINGS
Obama Received A “Perfect Liberal Score” On Economic Issues From The National Journal:
“In 2006, [Obama] Was One Of 13 Senate Democrats With A Perfect Liberal Score On Economic Issues.” (
Obama Gets Poor Marks From Tax, Spending And Business Interest Groups:
Americans For Tax Reform Gave Obama A Lifetime Rating Of 7.5 Out Of 100.
Citizens Against Government Waste Gave Obama A Lifetime Rating Of 22 Out Of 100.
The National Taxpayers Union Gave Obama A Grade Of “F” For His Fiscal Voting Record.
The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce Gave Obama A 33 Percent Rating In 2007.
Deliverance asks: "I just really hope you're wrong because this country can't afford to get much worse" Hate to break it to ya D...but I'm not wrong, it will worsen w/ him @ the helm and it's going to cost you somewhere between 10% & 20% of what you currently gross!
Apology not necessary.
Last edited by RidgeDad on September 20th, 2011, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: No New taxes
And I'll ask again. What other facts did I present are spin? This is your quote.Former Wildcat wrote:I would assume that other "facts" presented by Ridge Dad are similar. I find that both conservatives and liberals like to quote such "facts". Just keeping it real.
Just keeping it real.
Last edited by RidgeDad on September 20th, 2011, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
- count2infinity
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 4475
- Joined: September 1st, 2004, 6:44 pm
- Location: Clarion
Re: No New taxes
Obama is a terrorist, and an Arab... he cannot be trusted!!!
Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, ambition inspired, and success achieved.
