Page 3 of 3
Re: Mountain Athletic Conference (MAC)
Posted: May 12th, 2005, 8:40 am
by CNote34
Thats just a poor excuse...If they are as good as you make them sound to be then they should'nt have had any trouble against Mount Union...They just proved that they are a better team than Forest Hills.
Re: Mountain Athletic Conference (MAC)
Posted: May 12th, 2005, 8:41 am
by CNote34
Oh, by the way...that was one of the first lefty's Mount Union faced all season also...they didnt exactly have any trouble with him.
Re: Mountain Athletic Conference (MAC)
Posted: May 12th, 2005, 8:59 am
by saber
no trouble at all
Re: Mountain Athletic Conference (MAC)
Posted: May 12th, 2005, 6:39 pm
by rdogg1234
I see mount union will be awaiting the winner of the claysburg-portage game for the district tourney, they got the 1st seed. the question is who else is in the district 6 tourney?
Re: Mountain Athletic Conference (MAC)
Posted: May 13th, 2005, 8:56 am
by CNote34
Re: Mountain Athletic Conference (MAC)
Posted: May 13th, 2005, 1:52 pm
by Eaglealum
[quote="CNote34";p="93381"]Oh, by the way...that was one of the first lefty's Mount Union faced all season also...they didnt exactly have any trouble with him.
[/quote]
Clint Wilson held MU to 3 hits and 1 run. He's a pretty good lefty.
Posted: May 14th, 2005, 7:32 pm
by diplip29
Central Mountain is terrible usually
Re: Mountain Athletic Conference (MAC)
Posted: May 15th, 2005, 12:37 am
by CNote34
Correction...Clint Wilson lost to Mount Union 3-1 in there first meeting and gave up around 8 or so hits...He won the 2nd contest due to poor umpireing and also gave up about 8 hits that game...I'm not taking anything away from Clint though because he is a very good pitcher, but he didn't do as good against Mount Union as you say he did although he did do a fine job in both meetings.