Page 3 of 5
Re: FR vs TM
Posted: December 21st, 2003, 7:57 pm
by bison1
ihateu wrote:Well I know that The Truth has a point, and so do I. A "good ref" would have the fouls close for both teams....NOT 28-7
So, regardless of how either many fouls either team is actually commiting as long as the refs keep them even...they're good refs?
Well you guys heard it here, there is the key to being a succesful ref. For each foul called on the home team call one just like it for the away team!
FR vs TM
Posted: December 21st, 2003, 11:00 pm
by ihateu
Obviously you werent at the game Bison1!!! It wasnt just the fouls, it was double dribbles, travels, and other calls that were terrible. I know there is alot to good refs, but I just named a few! And since you probably wernt at the game and dont know what happed, I will fill you in my friend! The fouls at the end of the first half were like 14or15-1, and the one foul was an offensive. By the end of the game the fouls were 28-7 and two of the 7 fouls were offensive and 3 of them was to stop the clock. FR didnt even make it to the foul line until around 5 mins. left in the game! And just for the heck of it I would like to hear your definition of a "good ref" bison!
Posted: December 21st, 2003, 11:12 pm
by playbookboy06
ihateu i'm lost with your posts? are you for tussey?
FR
Posted: December 21st, 2003, 11:44 pm
by ihateu
No Im for Forbes
Posted: December 22nd, 2003, 4:19 pm
by bison1
I'll save you the trouble of reading an essay on the characteristics of a good ref. I can however tell you what doesn't qualify a ref to be "bad" in my book...not calling the same amount of fouls for both teams.
That's like saying the winning team had an unfair advantage in winning the game because they had more points...
FR
Posted: December 22nd, 2003, 4:39 pm
by ihateu
Like I said earlier bison...you wernt at the FR TM game!!! Save me the trouble of having to exlplain it to you again! Thank you
Posted: December 22nd, 2003, 10:28 pm
by Player24
yeah you're right...maybe you shouldn't explain it to anyone else...bc from what everyone else is saying you're making no sense what so ever.
Posted: December 22nd, 2003, 11:14 pm
by Gunner18
i agree with the bison, from what u said, weallhateyou, i mean ihateu, it sounds as if the refs were bad because they didnt call an equal number of fouls for both teams...did the possibility that one team could foul more than the other ever occur to u?
Posted: December 23rd, 2003, 12:28 am
by The Truth
Gunner18 were you even at the game. You just ask ihateu if it ever occured to him one team could foul more than the other. Just in case u werent there ill let you know Tussey plays Hard nose man to man they run through picks not around them and they had only one foul at the end of 3 quaters and it was offensive. You have got to be kidding me with your last post gunner that post is as bad as the refs were.
Posted: December 23rd, 2003, 12:32 am
by The Truth
I forgot to put in my last post Forbes playing alott of zone had over 20 fouls at the same point, but it wasnt only the fouls, double dribbles, walks , not to mention clapper spent the night in the paint, then at the end of the game Forbes happen to get called for the only 3 second call of the game. And if you know anthing at all about Tm u know how they hit the boards, no fouls. Give ihateu a break