Page 4 of 5

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 12th, 2008, 10:51 am
by straightshooter
Your section 1 picks I have to question. When I look at the up coming year I look at the coaches (Do they have a history of turning out good teams each year) and of course the returning talent (Players)

I rank the teams this year as follows:
Section 1
BG - One of the areas best young coaches
CC - This coach always has a top program year after year
PC. I do not know much about them.
Bedford – should be better than last year
CH – always near the bottom
Forest Hills - This coach has never produced and will have less talent this year.

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 12th, 2008, 3:18 pm
by Sleepy Floyd
Not sure how you can have Johnstown #1 when they were 12-15 last year.

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 12th, 2008, 6:10 pm
by heights33
straightshooter wrote:Your section 1 picks I have to question. When I look at the up coming year I look at the coaches (Do they have a history of turning out good teams each year) and of course the returning talent (Players)

I rank the teams this year as follows:
Section 1
BG - One of the areas best young coaches
CC - This coach always has a top program year after year
PC. I do not know much about them.
Bedford – should be better than last year
CH – always near the bottom
Forest Hills - This coach has never produced and will have less talent this year.
i dont understand how you can have CH second to last. not being bias or anything but CH was near the top last year, and they have 4 returning starters.

here what i think section 1 will look this year


BG
CH
CC
Bedford/PC
FH

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 12th, 2008, 8:22 pm
by sledge
bedford soccer dude,

I think that you have Section 1 listed as worst to first. I think having a healthy Holsinger for CC gets Traino a 20+ win season. A season without him may turn into a 15-9 kind of season for those in the county seat. Heights had a heck of a year last year, but can they duplicate it? BG may well just sneak up on people in Class A this year.
I can't argue much with your Section 2 picks. Somerset, Richland, and BC will probably be lousy. Westmont's new coach will have a lot of success if he can get the chemistry right, and keeps Callihan away from the boys. He was a lot more successful when he was on the other side of the gym with headphones on.

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 12th, 2008, 9:53 pm
by trojan nation #1
I cant see anyone giving the Trojans any problems this year. Heights will also be tough.
Sledge, I think Callahan was more than successful in his coaching stint at Westy before, he got that program on track. I guess we will just have to wait and see.

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 13th, 2008, 7:39 am
by WPIAL~Titan
Is Callahan an assistant coach at Westy this year?

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 13th, 2008, 7:55 am
by trojan nation #1
Yes, talked to his brother the asst. coach at BC last weekend and he confirmed it. Just one year to help in the transition from what I hear. He has been asst. AD for the passed 2 years. He has been around the league, could be a big help. Still not enough to beat the Trojans though.

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 13th, 2008, 11:47 am
by LHAChamps
Penn Cambria looks really good this year...with a 4 guard set...dziabo moving to 4 guard...mcmahon at point and swope and buck at 2 and 3 looks good

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 13th, 2008, 1:07 pm
by sydfinch
LHAChamps wrote:Penn Cambria looks really good this year...with a 4 guard set...dziabo moving to 4 guard...mcmahon at point and swope and buck at 2 and 3 looks good
How did they fare in the summer leagues?

Re: LHAC

Posted: November 13th, 2008, 2:35 pm
by Sleepy Floyd
Who took over at Penn Cambria for Gerwert?