So Portage doesn't get Berlin or North Star? They'll probably finish up around 7-2 and be a fairly high seed in 6A then.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 11th, 2010, 7:42 pm
by bbsocceralumni
Looking at their schedule, I think they will go 6-3. Losing to Windber, CT, and Ridge.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 11th, 2010, 10:26 pm
by thereplacement2
BB, why do you say that BV's defense is overrated? maybe Windbers offense is that strong?
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 11th, 2010, 10:57 pm
by bbsocceralumni
thereplacement2 wrote:BB, why do you say that BV's defense is overrated? maybe Windbers offense is that strong?
I won't say that yet. We will see when you guys play Ridge next week.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 11th, 2010, 11:10 pm
by thereplacement2
BV's D is very good, Windber just played very well last night. next week will be a great test for those young Ramblers.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 12th, 2010, 8:04 am
by bbsocceralumni
A "very good" defense doesn't allowed 42 points sorry.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 12th, 2010, 10:10 am
by S Cube
Chestnut Ridge's offense is at least equal to Windbers, probably a little better. They will most likely drop 40 on BV.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 12th, 2010, 10:15 am
by bbsocceralumni
I think Ridge will beat Windber this week.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 12th, 2010, 7:37 pm
by rainmaker
I just had crow for dinner. It didn't taste very good.
Shade was pumped and Ferndale wasn't.
Re: WESTPAC WEEK 2
Posted: September 12th, 2010, 7:43 pm
by Sportsfan22
bbsocceralumni,,,you obviously know a lot about berlin, and seem to know a little about north star.........wat's your opinion on this game in week 3....i was told Tony Strasiser was an animal on offense in north stars loss to Ridge...who would you rather have, strasiser or Will???