Page 5 of 7

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 6:57 am
by southpaw
How does that work? Do BC and Portage Coop in Wrestling?

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 7:47 am
by RidgeDad
southpaw wrote:How does that work? Do BC and Portage Coop in Wrestling?
Yes. BC wrestlers go to Portage to wrestle.

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 8:47 am
by hornets69
i believe i had heard something about a penn cambria/portage/bc boys soccer team being a co-op as well in the near future.

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 1:30 pm
by Manfred
You asked for a name, here it is. LUKE GOLDEN. Not gonna bore everyone with his stats. Look him up. BC all-state linebacker and sometimes RB . He played in the mid-90's.

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 3:37 pm
by El-Moldo
So youngbuck would agree that Perich would have been an asset to FH over the last few seasons?????? Guess he was wrong.

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 4:11 pm
by youngbuck
Luke Golden would not have started over, Steve Keiper who was the FB/RB at the time and I do not know who the other one was at the time, but possibly Justin Beyer.

I have never ever ever heard anyone from FH say, boy if we would have had Luke Golden, we would have won the state.


I know he was first team all state, but if you know anything about BC at that time, you would know that he was a two down backer who was taken off the field for 3rd downs due to speed issues. He liked to hit but limited in his running ability. Was not even the best player on his own team, behind Mcmahon and Jut Schilling . He made all state bsaed on stats, his tackle numbers were awfully high for a team that controlled the ball and won as many games as they did, you would not think that someone would have as many tackles if he played two downs and his team spent the majority of the game on offense.

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 4:18 pm
by youngbuck
Perich? Seriously who is he going to start over at FH, surely not Glessner. As an Rb, he was not starting over Dudovich, Mehall or even Unger. He would be a tiny wide reciever.

I could throw a bunch of names out, but seriously the Ranger faithful don't talk about the kids they lost to BC, anything like Windber, CT or Westmont whine about the players that they went to McCort. And Tyrone and Bellwood don't speak out about the players they didn't have because of BG.

What I am tryiing to say is that if your teamis already good, It does not seem that the catholic schools are taking players away. But in the cases of poor teams ie Westmont, Blacklick, why should the players stay there and lose.

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 4:33 pm
by usatf oldguy
So I guess no unheradled linemen or defensive players have ever left these schools and gone private.You know behind every good back is a great line.The same can be said for defenses.I can guarantee you this a small school that truly is a small school needs every player available to them.Who can guess about whether or not a team would have won a title or not. I can say for sure there was a reason that the PIAA had them (privates)separated in there own class before.

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 5:28 pm
by El-Moldo
Is youngbuck saying that, in any capacity as a player, Perich would not have made FH better over the last couple of years??????

Re: PUBLIC VS PRIVATE

Posted: November 19th, 2009, 5:30 pm
by El-Moldo
Wasn't that Penatzer kid, who was BC's QB a couple of years ago, from the FH school district also?????