Page 5 of 5
Re: Ridge to the WestPAC???
Posted: October 19th, 2007, 3:55 pm
by southpaw
This whole discussion is purely speculation over different ideas that have been floated by the PIAA. Frankly, I could care less about conference schedules. I suppose short of D 5/6 going to a format similar to the WPIAL (which IMO it should) the playoffs would be the same for 4 classes as it is for 6.
Re: Ridge to the WestPAC???
Posted: October 19th, 2007, 4:33 pm
by TheAnalyst
Correct me where I'm wrong Southpaw. I just took the overall enrollment numbers. Sorry for the formatting. Looks good until I submit. No time to fix.
- Westpac School --Current --10 years
Windber 1405 1258
Portage 980 1002
CV 962 913
North Star 1304 870
Rockwood 881 853
Meyersdale 982 835
Berlin 961 793
CT 1089 728
Ferndale 847 717
Blacklick 679 620
Shade 600 468
Turkeyfoot 370 279
LHAC School --Current --10 years
Bedford 2333 2193
FH 2258 1675
CC 1856 1922
PC 1784 1606
Richland 1605 1394
C Heights 1494 1344
WH 1758 1824
J-town 3239 2919
Chestnut Ridge 1758 1563
So where should Ridge be playing? They would clearly be the largest school in the Westpac, though I will admit I'm not positive on all the co-ops there. I thought Rockwood and TF co-opted. They are close to the middle of the LHAC if you include the Bishops.
Re: Ridge to the WestPAC???
Posted: October 20th, 2007, 12:15 am
by footballfan1
Well Bosshogg sorry but Ridge did not beat NBC 70-0. I was there watching the game. Two good teams going at it. Ridge is pretty big upfront and moved the ball but NBC hung in there. Ridge has a good team they will win some more games here.