Private Public School Debate

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
Post Reply
upnorth
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 739
Joined: September 18th, 2013, 2:26 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by upnorth »

animus wrote:Well SF won one for the good guys in rolling fashion. 0 way Imhotep comes back w/ a running clock.
Can you define "good guys" for me?
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 9012
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by El-Moldo »

non-females that are not bad
formerbcplayer
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 85
Joined: October 7th, 2004, 12:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by formerbcplayer »

PApride wrote:Problem with that is most likely they would all b AAA or AAAA and would still have to travel a lot, but they are private schools so shouldn't they all b rich charging kids to attend there?
It is expensive but they still do it cheaper than a public school.
formerbcplayer
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 85
Joined: October 7th, 2004, 12:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by formerbcplayer »

Blueandwhitefan wrote:
formerbcplayer wrote:Then there are issues going the other way. If the publics do not play privates then there will be some serious travel issues, money and time involved for the privates. Look at district 6 there are 4 private schools that play football, after that where do these schools have to go to play games, how far is to far.

There is a simple solution. Count every school a player comes from as a coop and add them to the total. Then they can play in their conference and play their size designation in the playoff's.
I have no desire to get into this but first it is not a co-op. If they seperate divisions then I want school vouchers, why should someone who sends their kids to a private have to pay to educate your kids.
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 9012
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by El-Moldo »

So they can get a bus ride to school???? Let's say the government provides a free car for everyone. Now it may be a Ford Focus, but everyone gets one for free. These cars are paid for through the myriad of taxes that everyone pays. Now, if you prefer to drive something else, you have the right to do so, but you have to pay for the other one yourself. So, it is YOUR choice which type of car you wish to drive. Why should anyone who is happy driving a Focus, have to help everyone else pay for a different car???? So why should citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have to help pay for tuitions to private schools???
Last edited by El-Moldo on December 15th, 2013, 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
formerbcplayer
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 85
Joined: October 7th, 2004, 12:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by formerbcplayer »

El-Moldo wrote:So they can get a bus ride to school???? Let's say the government provides a free car for everyone. Now it may be a Ford Pinto, but everyone gets one for free. These cars are paid for through a myriad of taxes. Now, if you prefer to drive something else, you have to pay for the other one yourself. So, it is YOUR choice which type of car you wish to drive. Why should anyone who is happy driving a Pinto, have to help everyone else pay for a different car???? So why should citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have to help pay for tuitions to private schools???
I don't have kids, hell I don't even live in PA just own property so why should I have to pay for any kid to go to school. If you want privates to count everyone then everyone should hace equal access to go there.
formerbcplayer
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 85
Joined: October 7th, 2004, 12:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by formerbcplayer »

Why don't public schools have to count the kids from their district who go to a private school.
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 9012
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by El-Moldo »

Many years ago, only land owners could vote. Now, everyone can vote if you are a certain age and register. Years ago, people recognized the importance of education, which benefitted society as a whole. Because of this, it was decided that property owners should help fund education for every child. But if a family wants a "special" educational atmosphere, it is their choice to partake of it, but THEY must pay for the "special" benefit. However, this does NOT excuse them from paying toward the basic education of the area's students. If I own a house in Johnstown, chances are I am not going to ever need the services of the Johnstown Fire Company. BUT, when I pay my city taxes, a certain amount is taken out to support the fire company every year. That's just how it is.
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 9012
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by El-Moldo »

Why don't public schools have to count the kids from their district who go to a private school???? In what regard??? I actually wish they would. Then these public schools would get more subsidies, which are based on attendance. Who wouldn't want money for 1000 students, and have only 800 at the school? Now, if you are talking about sports, there has to be a gauge to determine classification, so an actual count is necessary. Of course, due to SPECIAL considerations, such as no boundaries, last minute transfers, etc etc, some argue that classifications should be moved upward for private schools, as a means of fairness.
User avatar
animus
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 796
Joined: April 26th, 2011, 8:56 pm

Re: Private Public School Debate

Post by animus »

upnorth wrote:
animus wrote:Well SF won one for the good guys in rolling fashion. 0 way Imhotep comes back w/ a running clock.
Can you define "good guys" for me?
Being that SF is a local school bout 5 miles from my house and I work w/ a few alum from there, they were the good guys after Clairton got knocked out.
Post Reply