Page 7 of 8
Posted: September 26th, 2004, 1:18 pm
by Gunner18
i wasnt at the game but im assuming the ref that never left the 18 yard line was the one that was on the same half as the ridge defense? now assuming thats correct, then he did his job the way he is supposed to...refs are supposed to stay even with the last defender so that they can better handle offsides. and from what ive been told your sweeper was hanging out around the 18 or maybe a lil further up...
Re: CR vs. Bedford
Posted: September 26th, 2004, 1:32 pm
by count2infinity
i feel bad for saxman, he let 4 goals go in, none of which he could have done much about and i know he's gonna blame every single one on himself, i do it too when i'm in!
Re: CR vs. Bedford
Posted: September 26th, 2004, 2:32 pm
by thebackwall
When a goal is scored, unless it's a really easy goal to save, the keeper is not to blame. Gunner, this ref that never left the 18 also did not use his whistle hardly at all during the game. The ref on the other side of the field was blowing his whistle for stuff that was happening in the opposite corner. Oh yeah, #33 wasn't the only one who spread his legs on that direct kick...oops. :oops:
Re: CR vs. Bedford
Posted: September 26th, 2004, 2:39 pm
by count2infinity
what kinda wall has a hole in it?!?! :lol:
Re: CR vs. Bedford
Posted: September 28th, 2004, 12:44 pm
by Stryker22
In all seriousness, that game should have been closer than what the score showed. I won't deny that Bedford controlled the whole game..now i'm not trying to sound arrogant honest....but 4 of the 5 goals that they scored were after i got hurt.....we just need to work on a lot of stuff right now.
Re: CR vs. Bedford
Posted: September 28th, 2004, 1:59 pm
by BedfordFBall
wow i guess if it wasent for u the bisons would never have pulled off the 5-1 victory...... no need to be so modest
Re: CR vs. Bedford
Posted: September 28th, 2004, 2:34 pm
by Virus Maker Mang
The score 5-0 was indeed not showing what the game was like, it should have been more like 18-0. Bedford controlled the ball the whole time and Ridge barely even had a shot on goal. Next year boys.
Posted: September 28th, 2004, 10:43 pm
by CRplayer
18 nothin!!??? it was like 1-0 for like 3/4 of the game
Posted: September 28th, 2004, 11:08 pm
by crmid21
virus u guys didnt even have 18 shots in the game so i dont see where ur coming up with stuff like that... shut down pete bridges and u guys have no offense...what happened the 1st 60 minutes in that game...bridges was manned and u guys only scored 1 goal and that barely passed up the goalie
Posted: September 28th, 2004, 11:11 pm
by Gunner18
the reason pete is bedfords whole offense, is because once he gets the ball...HE NEVER PASSES! once pete gets subbed, the offense works as a team and scores alot more goals.