Page 8 of 9
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 27th, 2012, 3:35 pm
by sportsfan1000
thetruth22 wrote:Republicans try to act like the Government should be run like a business with everything having a bottom line. Wrong, I personally don’t care if the Government is in debt or the budget is balanced. I want my children to have the strongest education possible. I want our teachers worried about teaching and not whether or not they will have a job tomorrow. There are a couple things that should not have a price tag for the government. Education, and someone’s health. We can always get money and property back. We can’t do anything if we lose our education and our health. If the GOP is so concerned about the budget raise taxes on the ones who can afford to pay a little more, not cut from my kids education and my mother’s health benefits.
Taxing the rich 100% would not even put the slightest dent in the federal deficit. Taxing the rich is not the answer. Spending less on entitlement programs is the answer.
Obama...the Great Entitlement President. Welcome to the wonderful world of government dependence.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 27th, 2012, 3:51 pm
by Manfred
Hey sporty, ditto on your last few statements! I don't want to get off topic, but since the mighty "O" was mentioned, I saw a truck tailgate in Altoona the other day that read O ne B ig A ss M istake A merica.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 27th, 2012, 5:15 pm
by sportsfan1000
That is a great bumper sticker. BTW I just knew there was good in you manfred.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 27th, 2012, 5:32 pm
by Manfred
Back at'cha. I'm sure we'll still lock up occasionally
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 30th, 2012, 10:17 am
by say_oww
Manfred wrote:Back at'cha. I'm sure we'll still lock up occasionally
I thought conservatives were against homesexuality?
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 30th, 2012, 11:32 am
by thetruth22
sportsfan1000 wrote:thetruth22 wrote:Republicans try to act like the Government should be run like a business with everything having a bottom line. Wrong, I personally don’t care if the Government is in debt or the budget is balanced. I want my children to have the strongest education possible. I want our teachers worried about teaching and not whether or not they will have a job tomorrow. There are a couple things that should not have a price tag for the government. Education, and someone’s health. We can always get money and property back. We can’t do anything if we lose our education and our health. If the GOP is so concerned about the budget raise taxes on the ones who can afford to pay a little more, not cut from my kids education and my mother’s health benefits.
Taxing the rich 100% would not even put the slightest dent in the federal deficit. Taxing the rich is not the answer. Spending less on entitlement programs is the answer.
Obama...the Great Entitlement President. Welcome to the wonderful world of government dependence.
I don’t know if you know this or not but cutting all entitlements won’t be enough to lower the budget either without raising taxes. I would rather us raise taxes on the wealthy than to cut education, it might not bring in enough money to completely balance the budget, but it will bring in enough so that we don’t have to destroy our education system.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 30th, 2012, 3:25 pm
by Manfred
say ouchy: HOME-sexuality? Is that when you get it on @ home? Now I know why that worthless rag you work for doesn't have spellcheck but should.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 30th, 2012, 8:01 pm
by sportsfan1000
thetruth22 wrote:sportsfan1000 wrote:thetruth22 wrote:Republicans try to act like the Government should be run like a business with everything having a bottom line. Wrong, I personally don’t care if the Government is in debt or the budget is balanced. I want my children to have the strongest education possible. I want our teachers worried about teaching and not whether or not they will have a job tomorrow. There are a couple things that should not have a price tag for the government. Education, and someone’s health. We can always get money and property back. We can’t do anything if we lose our education and our health. If the GOP is so concerned about the budget raise taxes on the ones who can afford to pay a little more, not cut from my kids education and my mother’s health benefits.
Taxing the rich 100% would not even put the slightest dent in the federal deficit. Taxing the rich is not the answer. Spending less on entitlement programs is the answer.
Obama...the Great Entitlement President. Welcome to the wonderful world of government dependence.
I don’t know if you know this or not but cutting all entitlements won’t be enough to lower the budget either without raising taxes. I would rather us raise taxes on the wealthy than to cut education, it might not bring in enough money to completely balance the budget, but it will bring in enough so that we don’t have to destroy our education system.
My goodness, I don't even know where to begin so I'm not even going to try. So misguided.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 30th, 2012, 9:27 pm
by El-Moldo
Tax the rich, feed the poor; til there are no rich no more? The first 2 minutes says it best.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjpNqfKUtfw
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Posted: January 31st, 2012, 10:48 am
by say_oww
Manfred wrote:say ouchy: HOME-sexuality? Is that when you get it on @ home? Now I know why that worthless rag you work for doesn't have spellcheck but should.
Seriously, a spellcheck dig??? How about a grammar check, Manny? Aw, Why doesn't the worthless rag have what you said I thought you said why it has what it should???
Whatever, you call it, I didn't think conservatives approved. Don't worry, from now on I won't ask so you don't have to tell us when you guys "lock up".
