BleacherCoaches.com

I'm just surprised shocker hasn't decided to use D6 wrestling to prove his point like he does in some threads.

Why are you STOCKING me ak47?

How many did tussey lose by to johnstown? (4) If I recall it was a fairly close game.


For anyone who has ever seen/played against bailey in the terrordome things are a little bit different. There is more than a 4 point swing playing there.


Looking at some old scores Fannett-Metal beat TM by more than 4 so I guess that means they would have beaten Johnstown to Then forbes beat Fannett-Metal by 15 plus so they would have won against Johnstown to



I'll repeat what I said before. The SHL would have done fine this year in the LHAC but I feel certain that next year it wont be the same. I dont have any blinders on.

Tussey/SF/maybe fannet and forbes would have done decent in the LHAC... but Hyndman, Mcconelsburg, everet, cr???
Come on. You say you dont have blinders but......think about the entire sliding hill. I dont think so.

You got me shocker I was not completely clear in my last post. I 100% agree with you. Hyndman, cr and mburg and everett would have had bad years in the LHAC. I might throw NBC in with the mix of tm/sf/fr/fm as they might have had a few wins.


The top of both leagues would have created a lot of good close games as I think all of those teams had the potential to win on any given night against the other league. However, I think the same could have been said for the bottom of both leagues as they could have competed against the bottom of the other league only.


No pun intended, but the top of both leagues should have been "in a league of their own"

That last statement rings true. The LHAC wasn't that dominant from an entire league standpoint, but the top 4 or 5 in each league would have been good fantasy fodder were they to play each other.

http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/conte ... ml?nav=751


A pretty good article