Page 1 of 1
BC players out vs BM??
Posted: September 16th, 2008, 7:22 pm
by Dfense wins games
The Tribune states, “Students who do not meet the required AR deadlines will be placed on Academic Probation for a minimum of two weeks.”
Would week 2 be vs the Crushers?
I hope not, I want to see this game with BC at its best!
Re: BC players out vs BM??
Posted: September 17th, 2008, 8:58 am
by kut11ch
They will be playing. Whats messed up is this punishment hurt the team more then the 5 players who got suspended. You could have given them detention or something that would've effected just them. Also, the non-athletes at BC if they don't have their reading done they don't get punished in any way. The Tribune Dem commends BC for doing this there were so many other things BC could've done with these kids. BC should be 3-0 right now 6 turnovers mostly on simple handoffs. Julock could've had 200 yds last week. Well that's the past better luck this week 24-20 BC over BM.
Re: BC players out vs BM??
Posted: September 17th, 2008, 9:25 am
by pats39
I see your point, but you can't sit here and say BC would have won indefinitely, Unless Julock is some kind of Troy Palamalu in the secondary he would not have done much about BC giving about almost 400 yards through the air, more of the blame for that would go towards whoever decided the defensive gameplan.
Re: BC players out vs BM??
Posted: September 17th, 2008, 2:43 pm
by Crimson09Crazy
Richland was winning that game one way or another...they simply wouldve passed for a touchdown everytime Julock ran one in....
Also i think McCort's defense is certainly ready for the type of attack BC runs id be surprised if they got 24 points up....just sayin not tryin to throw your prediction down
Re: BC players out vs BM??
Posted: September 17th, 2008, 3:02 pm
by kut11ch
Come on 6 turnovers, that would not of happened with the starting qb and rb in there. Three fumbles were the qb pulling out on the fake to the Fullback(qb fundamentals). All I'm saying without those TO's you wouldn't have had those chances also BC would've controlled the clock. Richland did not have a bad plan moving the pocket on O away from the blitz, but their def had holes and for Woo not a bad RB to get 100yds Julock would've had 200+. Whats done is done 2-1 . BC and BM is alaways a tough game and I always got to go with BC and CC not matter who they play. I cant wait.
Re: BC players out vs BM??
Posted: September 17th, 2008, 10:34 pm
by imright
I don't know how much it was a good game plan of Richland or a terrible game plan by Bishop Carroll to play man defense against a spread offense with talented wr's.