Final Thoughts on USC, and Moving Forward.
Posted: January 2nd, 2009, 8:19 pm
There were a handful of selected BCS teams that Penn State would have defeated, and there were 3 that were going to give them a lot of problems. Those problems arise because of Penn State's stubborn approach to their secondary. You can blame it on Buggs, you can blame it on Bradley, Paterno, or a combination of the 3, but this is the same philosophy that was in place when Jerry Sandusky was running this defense. Against top WRs and a top QB, they play a bend but don't break coverage. In almost every instance where PSU loses a game, it can be attributed to this secondary coverage.
It needs to change, it has needed to be changed for 40 years. It will not change, until the Big Ten attains about 4 teams who all crush Penn State because of that coverage weakness. Ohio State did it in 2007. Other than that, the Big Ten simply does not have teams who fit that mold. If it works well enough for you to win 2 conference titles in 4 years, its hard to change people's mindsets.
Yesterday, Penn State went up against a team that I knew was going to exploit that weakness. There is not a better head coach in college football when it comes to preparedness for big games. What PSU fans were hoping for was a Mark Sanchez that made a lot of mistakes. He did not. USC did everything they should have done to move the ball on Penn State. There's thousands of us would have written down the exact same gameplan for USC as the one USC used.
USC did take their foot off the gas, and that's probably a tribute to Joe, like Spurrier did a few years back when UF was destroying Penn State. But do you do a program a disservice by letting up? Maybe a 60 point drumming is what PSU needed on a national stage. I can tell you that me personally, listening to the commentators acknowledge that insane coverage time and time again was like I was digging a screwdriver deeper and deeper into my leg every time I heard it.
USC did take their foot of the gas, but it might not be as evident as it is at first glance. They DID keep the starters in the whole game, and that defense was definitely pretty irritated that PSU was moving the ball and scoring. It could be that the "let up" was simply that the game was pretty safe and the USC players knew it. But still though, it was a different USC team in the second half, and that needs to be acknowledged.
On to Penn State.
I never thought I would be saying this, but I thought the offensive playcalling was great. There was only one play that I felt was a disaster and a bad call, and that was the backwards pitch to Williams when PSU was inside the 10. I saw the same thing today with Ole Miss, and it was equally as fruitless. That's a bad playcall. Other than that, especially in the second half, I honestly think the offense played pretty well overall, minus the penalties. I thought Clark played a great football game with the few exceptions of holding on to the ball too long on a few occasions. There were a few tipped passes when the PSU receiver was open, and those are the breaks.
Defensively, the miscues cost them bigtime. The coverage we have already discussed. In addition to that, I thought Bowman played an exceptional game, but he needs to get a little better at grabbing a jersey or a foot when he can't make the tackle with his body. That will come with time. I think it is only good news that Sales is graduating, and it is also only good news that Lee will be back next season to replace Josh Hull, who's scholarship is grand larceny at this point. In limited duty, Mauti (freshman) looked great.
With the 4 starting members of the secondary leaving, people are going to use that against Penn State in the preseason rankings. But what PSU has had lately were a handful of small and relatively unathletic CBs, and two Safeties who play gritty ball but are overall ill-equipped against teams like they faced yesterday. But the point needs to be made again that it doesn't matter who is back there if you set them up for failure.
Clark played a great game. I saw a noticable increase in his quarterbacking yesterday versus this whole regular season, and that's great news. The bad news is that Royster is an injury prone kid, and the 3 starting WRs are leaving. The depth that PSU has been starting to slowly amass will need to be ready to step in in August and make a go of it. They have kids who are much highly regarded than Norwood and Butler were when they stepped on the scene. We shall see. I am however optimistic from what I have seen of Brackett, Zug, and especially Moye. There will be at least 1 freshman break into that WR eschelon, and I think it will be Derrick Thomas, a kid who is coming in right now as a CB. Curtis Drake is also listed as a CB, but he won PIAA player of the year this season as an offensive weapon. The offensive future does look bright, however young at some undesirable positions.
The kids on offense that I think will be stars in 2009, with the exception of the returning starters, are De'Onte Pannell, either Thomas or Drake, and probably Quinn Barham. I am also watching this Zordich switch from LB to FB, and I think the PSU FB quick-hitter we saw twice yesterday with Lawlor can become a big time play with a kid a step faster than Lawlor. I love that FB usage, and Zordich is the kid that can open this back up for us as a receiving threat as well, like it was with the under-utilized Matt Hahn.
Defensively, they are very impressed with the quick development of D'Anton Lynn, who will take over at the corner opposite Wallace. At Safety, it looks like Astorino is the obvious choice back there, and that's more of the same grittiness of Rubin and Scirrotto, but I do think that with another year under his belt, Astorino will have a better season than the serious disappointment that Scirrotto was all year, who was out of place many times, and also waited to be blocked in many instances. You also cannot say enough good stuff about Mauti and Nate Stupar, but you can only put so many LB's on the field at once. Mauti has all the makings of being a huge LB for the Nits like Connor, Conlan, Gelzheiser, Arrington, Short, Poz, Collins, to name a few recent ones. There is also a lot of love for Mike Yancich, but I dont know where they plan on putting all these kids. Devon Still is a kid who is really, really going to open eyes on the defensive line.
It is looking like Maybin and Evans are leaning towards going pro, which I honestly think is a huge mistake in both cases. That opens up both starting DE positions to the good depth Larry Johnson has accumulated. Jack Crawford is a kid that people seriously think will be on the top DEs in PSU history when it is all sad and done. I guess Latimore fills the other role, but that will be an open battle.
The special teams will be interesting. I doubt Powell assumes the kick return duties, and I think this competition will be opened back up. True freshman Anthony Fera will obliterate Collin Wagner in the offseason starting K competition, and will be a 4 year starter. Punter? I have no idea. I guess Ryan Breen, but I am thinking Fera will be back there for this as well, which I am not sure I agree with.
Looking around the conference... and with the nation's worst OOC schedule... Penn State should be favored slightly over Ohio State as the Big Ten favorites. They should also start the season around 10th nationally, depending on whether or not Maybin and Evans realize how unprepared they both are currently to go pro. But even so, I think Penn State will win the Big Ten, and it will of course be between PSU and OSU again, like this year.
It needs to change, it has needed to be changed for 40 years. It will not change, until the Big Ten attains about 4 teams who all crush Penn State because of that coverage weakness. Ohio State did it in 2007. Other than that, the Big Ten simply does not have teams who fit that mold. If it works well enough for you to win 2 conference titles in 4 years, its hard to change people's mindsets.
Yesterday, Penn State went up against a team that I knew was going to exploit that weakness. There is not a better head coach in college football when it comes to preparedness for big games. What PSU fans were hoping for was a Mark Sanchez that made a lot of mistakes. He did not. USC did everything they should have done to move the ball on Penn State. There's thousands of us would have written down the exact same gameplan for USC as the one USC used.
USC did take their foot off the gas, and that's probably a tribute to Joe, like Spurrier did a few years back when UF was destroying Penn State. But do you do a program a disservice by letting up? Maybe a 60 point drumming is what PSU needed on a national stage. I can tell you that me personally, listening to the commentators acknowledge that insane coverage time and time again was like I was digging a screwdriver deeper and deeper into my leg every time I heard it.
USC did take their foot of the gas, but it might not be as evident as it is at first glance. They DID keep the starters in the whole game, and that defense was definitely pretty irritated that PSU was moving the ball and scoring. It could be that the "let up" was simply that the game was pretty safe and the USC players knew it. But still though, it was a different USC team in the second half, and that needs to be acknowledged.
On to Penn State.
I never thought I would be saying this, but I thought the offensive playcalling was great. There was only one play that I felt was a disaster and a bad call, and that was the backwards pitch to Williams when PSU was inside the 10. I saw the same thing today with Ole Miss, and it was equally as fruitless. That's a bad playcall. Other than that, especially in the second half, I honestly think the offense played pretty well overall, minus the penalties. I thought Clark played a great football game with the few exceptions of holding on to the ball too long on a few occasions. There were a few tipped passes when the PSU receiver was open, and those are the breaks.
Defensively, the miscues cost them bigtime. The coverage we have already discussed. In addition to that, I thought Bowman played an exceptional game, but he needs to get a little better at grabbing a jersey or a foot when he can't make the tackle with his body. That will come with time. I think it is only good news that Sales is graduating, and it is also only good news that Lee will be back next season to replace Josh Hull, who's scholarship is grand larceny at this point. In limited duty, Mauti (freshman) looked great.
With the 4 starting members of the secondary leaving, people are going to use that against Penn State in the preseason rankings. But what PSU has had lately were a handful of small and relatively unathletic CBs, and two Safeties who play gritty ball but are overall ill-equipped against teams like they faced yesterday. But the point needs to be made again that it doesn't matter who is back there if you set them up for failure.
Clark played a great game. I saw a noticable increase in his quarterbacking yesterday versus this whole regular season, and that's great news. The bad news is that Royster is an injury prone kid, and the 3 starting WRs are leaving. The depth that PSU has been starting to slowly amass will need to be ready to step in in August and make a go of it. They have kids who are much highly regarded than Norwood and Butler were when they stepped on the scene. We shall see. I am however optimistic from what I have seen of Brackett, Zug, and especially Moye. There will be at least 1 freshman break into that WR eschelon, and I think it will be Derrick Thomas, a kid who is coming in right now as a CB. Curtis Drake is also listed as a CB, but he won PIAA player of the year this season as an offensive weapon. The offensive future does look bright, however young at some undesirable positions.
The kids on offense that I think will be stars in 2009, with the exception of the returning starters, are De'Onte Pannell, either Thomas or Drake, and probably Quinn Barham. I am also watching this Zordich switch from LB to FB, and I think the PSU FB quick-hitter we saw twice yesterday with Lawlor can become a big time play with a kid a step faster than Lawlor. I love that FB usage, and Zordich is the kid that can open this back up for us as a receiving threat as well, like it was with the under-utilized Matt Hahn.
Defensively, they are very impressed with the quick development of D'Anton Lynn, who will take over at the corner opposite Wallace. At Safety, it looks like Astorino is the obvious choice back there, and that's more of the same grittiness of Rubin and Scirrotto, but I do think that with another year under his belt, Astorino will have a better season than the serious disappointment that Scirrotto was all year, who was out of place many times, and also waited to be blocked in many instances. You also cannot say enough good stuff about Mauti and Nate Stupar, but you can only put so many LB's on the field at once. Mauti has all the makings of being a huge LB for the Nits like Connor, Conlan, Gelzheiser, Arrington, Short, Poz, Collins, to name a few recent ones. There is also a lot of love for Mike Yancich, but I dont know where they plan on putting all these kids. Devon Still is a kid who is really, really going to open eyes on the defensive line.
It is looking like Maybin and Evans are leaning towards going pro, which I honestly think is a huge mistake in both cases. That opens up both starting DE positions to the good depth Larry Johnson has accumulated. Jack Crawford is a kid that people seriously think will be on the top DEs in PSU history when it is all sad and done. I guess Latimore fills the other role, but that will be an open battle.
The special teams will be interesting. I doubt Powell assumes the kick return duties, and I think this competition will be opened back up. True freshman Anthony Fera will obliterate Collin Wagner in the offseason starting K competition, and will be a 4 year starter. Punter? I have no idea. I guess Ryan Breen, but I am thinking Fera will be back there for this as well, which I am not sure I agree with.
Looking around the conference... and with the nation's worst OOC schedule... Penn State should be favored slightly over Ohio State as the Big Ten favorites. They should also start the season around 10th nationally, depending on whether or not Maybin and Evans realize how unprepared they both are currently to go pro. But even so, I think Penn State will win the Big Ten, and it will of course be between PSU and OSU again, like this year.