Some PSU hockey thoughts...
Posted: August 29th, 2010, 12:06 am
Had 2 very lengthy discussions today with close friends who are big college hockey fans, and just wanted to post some opinions and see what you guys think.
I've been thinking a lot about this D1 hockey program coming to PSU, and I am extremely excited at this news. I've been hoping for a long time that we would get a D1 hockey program.
My friend today called and said that the latest he had heard (he is not a PSU or B10 guy) was that the Big Ten was already talking about a hockey super conference. He did not really know what "super" entailed, and I dont either. Regardless, it sparked a lot of discussion between us.
The B10 network has already started showing hockey games that involved Big Ten schools. As you know, there is no B10 in regards to hockey... yet. But many of the Big Ten schools have hockey programs. They are also very good. But being that some of the B10 member schools are involved in other hockey conferences, my fear is over what becomes of those conferences once you remove the B10 member schools from the conference ranks.
There are schools in the B10 vicinity that are strong programs, like North Dakota, Miami Ohio, Michigan Tech, St Cloud State, etc, etc. In my opinion, even if Michigan Tech is ranked 1st in the nation, and Michigan State is ranked 25th, it is still a huge win for a place like Michigan Tech, who's only real sports-credibility is hockey based. They NEED to play schools like Michigan and Ohio State, and even though they may have better teams than UM or OSU, the win still carries a lot of weight. I personally feel that these smaller schools need to have the conference rivalres with the much larger universities like Michigan, etc.
If you pull out the B10 schools to form the B10 hockey conference, what happens to Miami Ohio?
College hockey, right now, is having some issues where kids are choosing to forego college in order to be plugged into the NHL system. The reason is exposure. I personally feel that the Big Ten Network WILL show collegiate hockey a hell of a lot more than ESPN will, obviously. Basiclaly, if the BTN is serious about showcasing college hockey, an 18 yr old prospect, if he decides to go the college route, has this option: Do I want to go to the B10 and know I will be on TV relatively often, or do I want to go to Michigan Tech and pray we make the Frozen Four so I will get one or two games televised?
As much as I love the B10 and the idea of a B10 hockey conference, I like that in college hockey there are schools like North Dakota who can defeat these much more notable universities. Hockey is "the thing" on some of these campuses. It might not affect North Dakota or Vermont, but I think it will crush Cornell and Miami Ohio and the non-B10 Michigan schools.
Then there is title IX, 14 football universities out of 120 are the only ones operating in the green, and the initial "on the fence" opinions of some schools to start D1 hockey. What do you do if B10 members are not interested or cannot support D1 hockey? Do you add hockey-exclusive members to the B10, or is the B10 too "elitest" to consider such an endeavor?
Then, of course, what do you do with the hockey-exclusive members when the other B10 member schools decide to start playing D1 hockey? Kick them out?
There are so many good things that can come out of a B10 hockey conference, and I suppose at the end of the day all we should care about is the growth of the sport, but are we going to crush the little guys in the prcess?
I've been thinking a lot about this D1 hockey program coming to PSU, and I am extremely excited at this news. I've been hoping for a long time that we would get a D1 hockey program.
My friend today called and said that the latest he had heard (he is not a PSU or B10 guy) was that the Big Ten was already talking about a hockey super conference. He did not really know what "super" entailed, and I dont either. Regardless, it sparked a lot of discussion between us.
The B10 network has already started showing hockey games that involved Big Ten schools. As you know, there is no B10 in regards to hockey... yet. But many of the Big Ten schools have hockey programs. They are also very good. But being that some of the B10 member schools are involved in other hockey conferences, my fear is over what becomes of those conferences once you remove the B10 member schools from the conference ranks.
There are schools in the B10 vicinity that are strong programs, like North Dakota, Miami Ohio, Michigan Tech, St Cloud State, etc, etc. In my opinion, even if Michigan Tech is ranked 1st in the nation, and Michigan State is ranked 25th, it is still a huge win for a place like Michigan Tech, who's only real sports-credibility is hockey based. They NEED to play schools like Michigan and Ohio State, and even though they may have better teams than UM or OSU, the win still carries a lot of weight. I personally feel that these smaller schools need to have the conference rivalres with the much larger universities like Michigan, etc.
If you pull out the B10 schools to form the B10 hockey conference, what happens to Miami Ohio?
College hockey, right now, is having some issues where kids are choosing to forego college in order to be plugged into the NHL system. The reason is exposure. I personally feel that the Big Ten Network WILL show collegiate hockey a hell of a lot more than ESPN will, obviously. Basiclaly, if the BTN is serious about showcasing college hockey, an 18 yr old prospect, if he decides to go the college route, has this option: Do I want to go to the B10 and know I will be on TV relatively often, or do I want to go to Michigan Tech and pray we make the Frozen Four so I will get one or two games televised?
As much as I love the B10 and the idea of a B10 hockey conference, I like that in college hockey there are schools like North Dakota who can defeat these much more notable universities. Hockey is "the thing" on some of these campuses. It might not affect North Dakota or Vermont, but I think it will crush Cornell and Miami Ohio and the non-B10 Michigan schools.
Then there is title IX, 14 football universities out of 120 are the only ones operating in the green, and the initial "on the fence" opinions of some schools to start D1 hockey. What do you do if B10 members are not interested or cannot support D1 hockey? Do you add hockey-exclusive members to the B10, or is the B10 too "elitest" to consider such an endeavor?
Then, of course, what do you do with the hockey-exclusive members when the other B10 member schools decide to start playing D1 hockey? Kick them out?
There are so many good things that can come out of a B10 hockey conference, and I suppose at the end of the day all we should care about is the growth of the sport, but are we going to crush the little guys in the prcess?