Page 1 of 1

Everyone has an opinion, here's mine (conf. alignments)

Posted: September 13th, 2011, 11:37 am
by The Ancient Enemy
Should have some time to look at this very quickly.

Appears right now the SEC will be the first conference to break the 12-member threshold.

SEC:
=====
Georgia
Auburn
Alabama
Vanderbilt
Kentucky
Florida
Arkansas
Miss State
Ole Miss
Tennessee
South Carolina
LSU
Georgia Tech
Florida State
Texas A&M
Miami

Darkhorse: Texas / Clemson


BIG TEN:
=========
Nebraska
Penn State
Ohio State
Northwestern
Indiana
Illinois
Purdue
Iowa
Michigan
Michigan State
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Pitt
Rutgers
Kansas
Kansas State

Darkhorse: Missouri / Syracuse / Iowa State

I'm already seeing massive problems w/ only having 4 16-team conferences.

ACC:
======
Boston College
Virginia Tech
Virginia
Clemson
North Carolina
NC State
Duke
Wake Forest
Maryland
Syracuse?
UCONN?
Louisville?
Texas Tech?
Baylor?
Missouri?
Kansas and Kansas State?
Iowa State?
WVU?

What a mess this ACC will become.

PAC 16:
========
Cal
UCLA
USC
Oregon
Oregon State
Washington
Washington State
Arizona
Arizona State
Colorado
Utah
Stanford
Boise State?
TCU?
BYU?
Fresno?
Texas?
Oklahoma?
Oklahoma State?

What a mess.

Where do Cincinnati and USF end up? ACC? I'm sure Boston College is chomping at the bit to play in Lubbock. NO ONE in the Pac-10 (12) wants Fresno State. What happens to Nevada?

This is a monumental cluster F.

Re: Everyone has an opinion, here's mine (conf. alignments)

Posted: September 13th, 2011, 6:51 pm
by deliverance
The latest I'm hearing on Texas is the ACC. The SEC is a no go because of academics and all of the other shady things that go on in that conference. If Texas goes to the ACC, I'm guessing Kansas, Kansas State, and Texas Tech would come along.

Re: Everyone has an opinion, here's mine (conf. alignments)

Posted: September 15th, 2011, 4:20 pm
by The Ancient Enemy
Texas should go independent, schedule whoever they want, play games every year in Washington, Florida, and Boston, and market that product. They are the only current school who should be an independent. I actually wouldn't be upset if UT went independent and scheduled Oregon State, Notre Dame, Penn State, Miami, etc, every week.

Re: Everyone has an opinion, here's mine (conf. alignments)

Posted: September 15th, 2011, 5:23 pm
by deliverance
I wouldn't mind seeing it either, but going independent will be a last case scenario. The development of the Longhorn Network has changed everything for Texas as far as conference realignment goes. The Pac 10 wants Texas, but they would have to restructure the Longhorn Network and right now that's not an option. Texas is in a much tougher spot than they were a year ago due to their network actually launching. I'm not sure if you've seen it at all TAE, but it's a real game changer. Of course, at this point very few people can watch it since very few providers are carrying it.

On a different note, I think Texas and PSU will be scheduling each other before too long. The rumors have been flying around for two years now, so I have a feeling it gets done at some point in the near future. It'd be cool to see those two teams play each other.

Re: Everyone has an opinion, here's mine (conf. alignments)

Posted: September 16th, 2011, 1:07 am
by abpk2903
I wish a lot more teams would venture back to independent. It would blow up the BCS. What would they do if Notre Dame, BYU, Texas, and say a few other schools like Oklahoma and Oklahoma State played independent schedules?

Re: Everyone has an opinion, here's mine (conf. alignments)

Posted: September 16th, 2011, 2:41 pm
by tidesturning
For too many schools, going independent would mean they would have a lack of money. The conference affiliation guarantees money for everyone. That's how they sucker you in!