Thoughts on LHAC after two weeks of action

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
EGeorge
Sophomore
Sophomore
Posts: 55
Joined: April 14th, 2005, 10:01 pm
Location: Johnstown

Post by EGeorge »

and by the way...these d-1 kids...why do u say just because you're d-1 you are physical?? that's not true AT ALL..you should know they arent physical because u were at the scrimmage...kush is doing well but corson isn't impressing me
Fan of the Men of Troy and the Crushers until Week 7 :roll:
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 9012
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: Thoughts on LHAC after two weeks of action

Post by El-Moldo »

I said I saw 180 lb linemen handle bigger, more physical kids OVER THE YEARS, not last weekend. So I'm NOT wrong, as usual. And thanks for giving away Ham's brothers last name. I appreciate it. NOW I know who to scrutinize in the weeks to come. With friends like you, who needs enemies?
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 9012
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: Thoughts on LHAC after two weeks of action

Post by El-Moldo »

I am the Garbage Collector, that's how. And you're in my pile.
Heaven&Hoops
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 352
Joined: December 12th, 2003, 3:29 pm

Post by Heaven&Hoops »

After seeing the Westmont/Forest Hills score, I gotta believe that more Westmont players must have quit to concentrate on basketball.
BisonBlue07
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 317
Joined: February 9th, 2004, 7:23 pm
Location: On top of the world...Loretto

Re: Thoughts on LHAC after two weeks of action

Post by BisonBlue07 »

[quote="El-Moldo";p="102360"]Being physical means NOTHING!!!! It's all in the technique. Ask any line coach. Just because your line is made up of big galoots, doesn't translate into good line play.[/quote]

How does me saying that ya need a good mix of both technique and desire get twisted around into all this. I agree with you 100% moldo that a 180 lb. kid could win with good technique, but that perfect technique doesn't get you anywhere if you don't fire off the ball hard and have the desire to be physical as well. I don't really care if you think I suck, if Bedford sucks, or really anything that you think. I was just saying that yes, technique wins football games, but you also need a physicalness in your play
"Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein."
-Joe Theismann
El-Moldo
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 9012
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 11:58 pm

Re: Thoughts on LHAC after two weeks of action

Post by El-Moldo »

you must care. you just responded to what I have said on the subject.
Xylo
Junior
Junior
Posts: 128
Joined: October 8th, 2004, 8:15 am

Post by Xylo »

[quote="Heaven&Hoops";p="102541"]
After seeing the Westmont/Forest Hills score, I gotta believe that more Westmont players must have quit to concentrate on basketball.
[/quote]

Kanuch, Khuri, McKolosky and Rossi are all playing football. I don't know if Thompson or Balog (sp) ever did play football and I think that only leaves Adam Watson. I'm not sure if McKolosky still plays basketball, but that really doesn't matter (since he's playing football anyway).

Why does the score make you feel that way? It's not like this years' results were any different than the last two years.
Heaven&Hoops
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 352
Joined: December 12th, 2003, 3:29 pm

Post by Heaven&Hoops »

I was being sarcastic.

Everyone you mentioned except McKloskey plays basketball. Thompson isn't playing football this year because of an injury.
Post Reply