Week 9 LHAC Predictions

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
HuskiesFan
Freshman
Freshman
Posts: 9
Joined: October 13th, 2005, 3:07 pm

Week 9 LHAC Predictions

Post by HuskiesFan »

LHAC

Somerset (0-8 ) 6 @ Forest Hills(7-1) 44

Bishop McCort (6-2) 40 @ Cambria Heights (0-8 ) 0

Johnstown (4-4) 16 @ Bedford (6-2) 28

Richland (3-5) 17 @ Penn Cambria (5-3) 21

Westmont (5-3) 28 @ Central Martinsburg (2-6) 14

"Battle of the Burg"

Bishop Carroll Huskies (8-0) @ Central Cambria Red Devils (2-6)

A true Backyard Brawl, this is the 4th meeting between the two schools and
in the previous three the Huskies took the Devils to school and see no reason
why they won't this year. BC 31 - CC 7



WestPAC Superbowl


Windber (8-0) @ Portage (8-0)

Portage finally overcomes Windber's wrath.... Portage 28 - Windber 24
Last edited by HuskiesFan on October 25th, 2005, 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ham55
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 5125
Joined: September 16th, 2003, 12:26 pm

Post by ham55 »

It's week 9 to the best of my knowledge.

Somerset has scored 34 points all year this year, they won't add to that total this week. That'll be the 5th time they've been shut out in 2005. Other than that, I agree.
Pale Rider
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 885
Joined: February 20th, 2005, 6:26 pm

Re: Week 9 LHAC Predictions

Post by Pale Rider »

Don will allow the JV's to give up a score or 2 to the Eagles, after the starters put it up 41-0.
"What we've got here is...failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. I don't like it anymore than you men." -Strother Martin, COOL HAND LUKE
User avatar
ham55
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 5125
Joined: September 16th, 2003, 12:26 pm

Post by ham55 »

This team is terrible. Bedford's J.V.'s didn't allow a T.D. in the 2nd half. I feel quite certain yours won't either.
THE CHOPS
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1900
Joined: October 24th, 2003, 10:42 am
Location: SCOTTDALE, PA.

Re: Week 9 LHAC Predictions

Post by THE CHOPS »

Windber 14 & Portage 8

"The Chops
[font=Arial][/font]
THE CHOPS
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 1900
Joined: October 24th, 2003, 10:42 am
Location: SCOTTDALE, PA.

Re: Week 9 LHAC Predictions

Post by THE CHOPS »

color=blue]Windber 14 & Portage 8

"The Chops
[/color][font=Arial][/font]
User avatar
The Ancient Enemy
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 7549
Joined: October 30th, 2004, 2:47 pm

Re: Week 9 LHAC Predictions

Post by The Ancient Enemy »

Take Windber over Portage.
Pale Rider
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 885
Joined: February 20th, 2005, 6:26 pm

Re: Week 9 LHAC Predictions

Post by Pale Rider »

If Don had a beef against the opposing coach, which he doesn't, he would let the game be a shutout, but since he has nothing to gain by a whitewash against Steve Costea, AS I SAID, he will let the JV's give up a score or two to QB Kaufman and co.
"What we've got here is...failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. I don't like it anymore than you men." -Strother Martin, COOL HAND LUKE
User avatar
ham55
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 5125
Joined: September 16th, 2003, 12:26 pm

Post by ham55 »

I realize what you're saying. But as Bedford tried to let them score last week, they still were unable. You just have no idea how terrible this Somerset team is.
Pale Rider
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 885
Joined: February 20th, 2005, 6:26 pm

Re: Week 9 LHAC Predictions

Post by Pale Rider »

If that is the case, then so be it. I would bet on Don, though.
"What we've got here is...failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. I don't like it anymore than you men." -Strother Martin, COOL HAND LUKE
Post Reply