Westmont
-
IFugginHateMRSA
- Freshman

- Posts: 2
- Joined: October 25th, 2007, 8:41 am
Re: Westmont
If westmont wants to win, take Josh Vigna OUT
-
Dokkenball
- Grad Assistant

- Posts: 229
- Joined: January 9th, 2007, 2:27 pm
Re: Westmont
If some of the more talented Westmont kids had the heart of Josh Vigna, they would have a couple more wins and mommy and daddy wouldn't be campaigning to get rid of the coach. The Westmont parents ran out Ernie Fetzer, Skip Skowron, and now they are trying to get rid of McLaurin. Who in their right mind would apply for that job?
-
unsername7
- Freshman

- Posts: 3
- Joined: March 16th, 2007, 8:27 am
Re: Westmont
On behalf of almost all the Westmont school district, espically Westmont atheltics I would like to say that the kids from Westmont who post on here, rarely if ever, speak for anybody else. We don’t like them, but we can’t take away their internet privillages and ground them either, so everyones just going to have to put up with it. Sorry, it’s embarassing.
Re: Westmont
well gorillageorge considering westmont is a subpar team. I would have to say that no one on that team is worth taking a second look at. Even dan curry.
-
Dfense wins games
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 1401
- Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 10:17 pm
Re: Westmont
dude is right on with this...you silly westmont kids are so funny commin on here to talk yourselves or someone else up...
-
The Graduate
- Sophomore

- Posts: 90
- Joined: April 6th, 2007, 8:15 pm
Re: Westmont
I agree on multiple accounts here. 1. The westmont kids that come on here are an embarassment to the school because they are all ignorant and like to make fun of their own. 2. Who in their right minds would take the Westmont job? Ernie fetzer was a great coach although his tatics were controversial at times. skip was a decent coach, but mcclaurin is just as good of a coach as fetzer in my opinion. he is working with ok talent. esp doing what he di last year with that team. If the parents kick him out of that job... bye bye westmont football forever. Word of advice to any parents reading this, LET THE COACH COACH, its his job and he does what he can to win games. 3. Who the hell is Bigole77? seems like a nobody, and lieks to look at what he types.
-
Dokkenball
- Grad Assistant

- Posts: 229
- Joined: January 9th, 2007, 2:27 pm
Re: Westmont
I wouldn't call Westmont a sub-par team. Everything I have been reading in the paper and the District 6 website says that they will be the 8th playoff team.
If you ever notice, the Westmont kids that post on here are usually the kids that don't play and feel they are contributing by posting on this message board. The good kids and good players are too busy focusing their efforts towards football to be posting on this message board. My gut feeling also tells me that the majority of the people claiming to be Westmont posters are not from Westmont.
If you ever notice, the Westmont kids that post on here are usually the kids that don't play and feel they are contributing by posting on this message board. The good kids and good players are too busy focusing their efforts towards football to be posting on this message board. My gut feeling also tells me that the majority of the people claiming to be Westmont posters are not from Westmont.
Re: Westmont
Westmont is definitly a subpar team. considering the potential of talent westmont has, they should not have to battle for the 8 seed. westmont has a big line and some alright running backs. although i think nate felix and tj keklak should split time at tailback, and move merriman to fullback.
Re: Westmont
good luck tonight, westy. If I have a decent signal i'll try to post some updates.
-
Dfense wins games
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 1401
- Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 10:17 pm
Re: Westmont
westmont IS a subpar team...they are limping into the playoffs at a meager 5-4 and they arnt subpar??
Simple math: Mean(total wins divided by number of teams) and median (middle number - since its even u divid both 5+4 divided by 2) of wins in the LHAC is 4.5...they have 5 wins = slightly above average so... ok they arnt SUB par, but average..ok..
Simple math: Mean(total wins divided by number of teams) and median (middle number - since its even u divid both 5+4 divided by 2) of wins in the LHAC is 4.5...they have 5 wins = slightly above average so... ok they arnt SUB par, but average..ok..
