Rams vs. Crushers
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Bottom LIne:
1) BM's secondary isn't filled will All-Pro defenders as we were told all week.
2) Richland still can't stop the run wich is exactly what BM does very well.
McCort wins this game because they know how to finish/win games. That's something Richland is going to have to learn if they want to be serious contenders.
1) BM's secondary isn't filled will All-Pro defenders as we were told all week.
2) Richland still can't stop the run wich is exactly what BM does very well.
McCort wins this game because they know how to finish/win games. That's something Richland is going to have to learn if they want to be serious contenders.
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Agreed
and IMO Richland is a medicore team at best, so my only point was if BM expects to be district 6 champs and give Steelton a run, they have a lot of work on the defensive side especially, but overall great game like i said. Rams could have used their returning leading reciever Adam too.
and IMO Richland is a medicore team at best, so my only point was if BM expects to be district 6 champs and give Steelton a run, they have a lot of work on the defensive side especially, but overall great game like i said. Rams could have used their returning leading reciever Adam too.
-
kingdomofcrush07
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 422
- Joined: September 6th, 2007, 6:26 pm
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
the rams have lost 3 games in the last 4minutes of the 4th quarter by not scoring while having the ball deep in an opponents territory. Despite all of their other troubles it seems the biggest thorn in the side of the rams at this point is their inability to find a "closer." If I am picking a team Lowry is defiently that closer type player which every good team needs. Whether Richland has one on their current roster and doesnt know it, who knows time will tell.
-
Crimson09Crazy
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Moldo if i recall the scrimmage correctly it was 2-1 in the varsity section.
I belive Schrey found Reynolds across the middle for a 45 yard gain deep into Ranger territory. Then im not sure who punched it in. But i think it was 2-1.
I don't think you'll find a more complete player in the LHAC then Eric Lowry.
People are saying McCort better sure up for the D6 A playoffs.
I can garuntee there will not be a team nearly as good and as athletic as Richland.
I belive Schrey found Reynolds across the middle for a 45 yard gain deep into Ranger territory. Then im not sure who punched it in. But i think it was 2-1.
I don't think you'll find a more complete player in the LHAC then Eric Lowry.
People are saying McCort better sure up for the D6 A playoffs.
I can garuntee there will not be a team nearly as good and as athletic as Richland.
-
bleacherfan
- Junior

- Posts: 108
- Joined: June 10th, 2008, 8:31 am
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
somebody posted a statement that said e lowery is most complete player in lhac sorry to disagree but the most complete player is ben ridgely of cc safty, receiver and sometime running back id take him over anybody to lead my team a true leader
-
kingdomofcrush07
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 422
- Joined: September 6th, 2007, 6:26 pm
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Richland was not that athletic on friday night as they were without arguably one of the best reciever in the area. It is easy to just double 1 good WR, but what do you do when there are 2 with Adam as well. Lucky for BM they will not face that type of athletism until steelton where there excellent run defense and good defensive front should be a good match up.
-
Dfense wins games
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 1401
- Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 10:17 pm
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
First, it may be an opinion question, so bleacherfan, remind me to never ask your opinion on anything! Lowry had 4 tds, 200 total yards, a few highlight reel hits AND an int when BM needed it the most. I never even heard of this "ridgely" character. Take him, Ill take Lowry and we'll see ya week 8!
Scrimmage (n) - informal match between two competitors which does not go on record
So, until BM plays FH (which, as we all know,they wont), are we going to keep going back to this dang scrimmage!?!?!?! You Ranger fans are pathetic! It was a preseason game! Just because you feel FH is better than BM and CAN NOT prove it, your gunna keep coming back to the scrimmage until your fingers fall off! If I were you, Id start watching film on Richland and Tyrone and stop worring about dang BM.
Actually, I just thought of something! (Vman coming out in me) maybe your just trying to reassure yourselves that you are better than BM because you play Richland Week 9 and are scared to death that you may lose. Im sure youll have plenty of fertilizer to make that grass good and thick
..and stop putting Richland down to make it seem like BM is even worse...Richland matched up well vs BM and it showed all night...
Scrimmage (n) - informal match between two competitors which does not go on record
So, until BM plays FH (which, as we all know,they wont), are we going to keep going back to this dang scrimmage!?!?!?! You Ranger fans are pathetic! It was a preseason game! Just because you feel FH is better than BM and CAN NOT prove it, your gunna keep coming back to the scrimmage until your fingers fall off! If I were you, Id start watching film on Richland and Tyrone and stop worring about dang BM.
Actually, I just thought of something! (Vman coming out in me) maybe your just trying to reassure yourselves that you are better than BM because you play Richland Week 9 and are scared to death that you may lose. Im sure youll have plenty of fertilizer to make that grass good and thick
..and stop putting Richland down to make it seem like BM is even worse...Richland matched up well vs BM and it showed all night...
-
kingdomofcrush07
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 422
- Joined: September 6th, 2007, 6:26 pm
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
how do they match up well when mccort has all 3 yd starters in the seconardy and there best athlete Lowry covering Richlands only proven playmaker in ripple. You cant have it both ways.
-
Dfense wins games
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 1401
- Joined: November 3rd, 2005, 10:17 pm
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
All I meant was that BM defends the run better than the pass. So a passing team will do better vs BM than a running team. A good passing team will do even better!
Re: Rams vs. Crushers
Honestly, no HS team can rely on their secondary to defend the pass. If you have a good passing offense and give the QB time, you're going to be successful moving the ball. Finding the endzone may be a different story when you get into the redzone (Ask Richland).
To stop a good passing team, especially at the HS level, you need to get pressure on the QB. Period.
To stop a good passing team, especially at the HS level, you need to get pressure on the QB. Period.
