NEXT YEAR'S TOP 5
-
AmusedChatter
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 420
- Joined: August 31st, 2008, 2:28 am
Re: NEXT YEAR'S TOP 5
I am sorry PsuDefense but to anyone that actually watched the FH Central game last year would laugh at your statement. Runk had about 30 rushes for 150-200 yards....I am sorry awhile ago forgot actual numbers..... He had 1 rush for 90-95 yards. That is great but that also means he had 29 rushes for 55-105 yards. To say he ran all over Forest Hills is a stupid statement in my book.
For anyone that was there please back me up because I have totally forgotten about the true numbers. But all I need to say is that Mehall showed who was the better RB that game.
Not to say he is not that good but he is only a Sophmore so time will tell.
For anyone that was there please back me up because I have totally forgotten about the true numbers. But all I need to say is that Mehall showed who was the better RB that game.
Not to say he is not that good but he is only a Sophmore so time will tell.
-
hammertime
- Freshman

- Posts: 27
- Joined: January 20th, 2009, 9:05 pm
Re: NEXT YEAR'S TOP 5
somerset has some talent even though they blow...smith and beistal are great LBs and niemiec could possibly be a running back next year..
-
lhacbigfan
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 1718
- Joined: April 27th, 2006, 8:16 pm
Re: NEXT YEAR'S TOP 5
Sounds like someone's still bitter about the Rangers exit last year.... :lol:AmusedChatter wrote:I am sorry PsuDefense but to anyone that actually watched the FH Central game last year would laugh at your statement. Runk had about 30 rushes for 150-200 yards....I am sorry awhile ago forgot actual numbers..... He had 1 rush for 90-95 yards. That is great but that also means he had 29 rushes for 55-105 yards. To say he ran all over Forest Hills is a stupid statement in my book.
For anyone that was there please back me up because I have totally forgotten about the true numbers. But all I need to say is that Mehall showed who was the better RB that game.