Richland @ Forest Hills
Re: Richland @ Forest Hills
All evidence points to fact I pointed out a few weeks ago......best 3 teams in area may be A: BM, BA & Portage!lakersfan24 wrote: I'm sure McCort will need that rest for the rough and tough D6-A playoffs!!! LOL :oops:
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
Re: Richland @ Forest Hills
Okay there fbislife....here's the 2nd post in this thread and it's by a fh guy! You can't stop yourselves from using McCort as the standard!!football-is-life wrote:heres my opinion...you mccort people need to grow the hell up and if you want to talk about your team, do not do it in a forum that has nothing to do with mccort. second stop comparing mccort and forest hills with scores and stats because that means nothing....
Opinionguy wrote:This year in the LHAC it's FH & McCort, and then everybody else.
I have to say thank you to me ..." for not being stupid enough to go to Penn State."
-
kingdomofcrush07
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 422
- Joined: September 6th, 2007, 6:26 pm
Re: Richland @ Forest Hills
Hats off to FH defense shutting down the richland passing game and for not giving up more than 9 points all year. I am sure the field had something to do with the low scoring though as thats one of the worst fields in the area. Defensively FH seconardy didnt blow any coverages and was very sure in tackling etc...I believe that they are the only team that puts pressure on richland with 5 guys while playing at least 2 safties free. A lot of that is a great defense gameplan varying with the pressure comes from. They dared richland to run many times and richland does not have a running system. They have various running plays, but are not a 3 yards and a cloud of dust football team.
Re: Richland @ Forest Hills
well put. Without running plays feeding off of eachother and the pass game, Richland will NEVER reach its potential on offense. Running random run plays that give their 240lb running back no momentum is not very well thought out.