Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Programs
-
sportsfan1000
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 985
- Joined: October 22nd, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Taxing the rich 100% would not even put the slightest dent in the federal deficit. Taxing the rich is not the answer. Spending less on entitlement programs is the answer.thetruth22 wrote:Republicans try to act like the Government should be run like a business with everything having a bottom line. Wrong, I personally don’t care if the Government is in debt or the budget is balanced. I want my children to have the strongest education possible. I want our teachers worried about teaching and not whether or not they will have a job tomorrow. There are a couple things that should not have a price tag for the government. Education, and someone’s health. We can always get money and property back. We can’t do anything if we lose our education and our health. If the GOP is so concerned about the budget raise taxes on the ones who can afford to pay a little more, not cut from my kids education and my mother’s health benefits.
Obama...the Great Entitlement President. Welcome to the wonderful world of government dependence.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Hey sporty, ditto on your last few statements! I don't want to get off topic, but since the mighty "O" was mentioned, I saw a truck tailgate in Altoona the other day that read O ne B ig A ss M istake A merica.
It ain't over until it's over.
-
sportsfan1000
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 985
- Joined: October 22nd, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
That is a great bumper sticker. BTW I just knew there was good in you manfred.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Back at'cha. I'm sure we'll still lock up occasionally
It ain't over until it's over.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
I thought conservatives were against homesexuality?Manfred wrote:Back at'cha. I'm sure we'll still lock up occasionally
-
thetruth22
- Junior

- Posts: 114
- Joined: June 14th, 2008, 1:57 pm
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
sportsfan1000 wrote:Taxing the rich 100% would not even put the slightest dent in the federal deficit. Taxing the rich is not the answer. Spending less on entitlement programs is the answer.thetruth22 wrote:Republicans try to act like the Government should be run like a business with everything having a bottom line. Wrong, I personally don’t care if the Government is in debt or the budget is balanced. I want my children to have the strongest education possible. I want our teachers worried about teaching and not whether or not they will have a job tomorrow. There are a couple things that should not have a price tag for the government. Education, and someone’s health. We can always get money and property back. We can’t do anything if we lose our education and our health. If the GOP is so concerned about the budget raise taxes on the ones who can afford to pay a little more, not cut from my kids education and my mother’s health benefits.
Obama...the Great Entitlement President. Welcome to the wonderful world of government dependence.
I don’t know if you know this or not but cutting all entitlements won’t be enough to lower the budget either without raising taxes. I would rather us raise taxes on the wealthy than to cut education, it might not bring in enough money to completely balance the budget, but it will bring in enough so that we don’t have to destroy our education system.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
say ouchy: HOME-sexuality? Is that when you get it on @ home? Now I know why that worthless rag you work for doesn't have spellcheck but should.
It ain't over until it's over.
-
sportsfan1000
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 985
- Joined: October 22nd, 2006, 9:38 pm
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
My goodness, I don't even know where to begin so I'm not even going to try. So misguided.thetruth22 wrote:I don’t know if you know this or not but cutting all entitlements won’t be enough to lower the budget either without raising taxes. I would rather us raise taxes on the wealthy than to cut education, it might not bring in enough money to completely balance the budget, but it will bring in enough so that we don’t have to destroy our education system.sportsfan1000 wrote:Taxing the rich 100% would not even put the slightest dent in the federal deficit. Taxing the rich is not the answer. Spending less on entitlement programs is the answer.thetruth22 wrote:Republicans try to act like the Government should be run like a business with everything having a bottom line. Wrong, I personally don’t care if the Government is in debt or the budget is balanced. I want my children to have the strongest education possible. I want our teachers worried about teaching and not whether or not they will have a job tomorrow. There are a couple things that should not have a price tag for the government. Education, and someone’s health. We can always get money and property back. We can’t do anything if we lose our education and our health. If the GOP is so concerned about the budget raise taxes on the ones who can afford to pay a little more, not cut from my kids education and my mother’s health benefits.
Obama...the Great Entitlement President. Welcome to the wonderful world of government dependence.
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Tax the rich, feed the poor; til there are no rich no more? The first 2 minutes says it best.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjpNqfKUtfw
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjpNqfKUtfw
Re: Effect of State Budget Proposal on District Sport's Prog
Seriously, a spellcheck dig??? How about a grammar check, Manny? Aw, Why doesn't the worthless rag have what you said I thought you said why it has what it should???Manfred wrote:say ouchy: HOME-sexuality? Is that when you get it on @ home? Now I know why that worthless rag you work for doesn't have spellcheck but should.
Whatever, you call it, I didn't think conservatives approved. Don't worry, from now on I won't ask so you don't have to tell us when you guys "lock up".