Bad Conference Teams

[Footballfans4life]

I think when it comes to LHAC, WestPac, ICC, Heritage, etc. The LHAC is the strongest each year. Yes a very good Homer Team, a very good Central, and a very good Clearfield beat LHAC teams in their perspective finals, but the difference for me is looking at all members in each of the conferences.

Also, let me start by saying I believe Portage, Berlin, tM, Central, Homer, Penns Manor, Bellwood, each would have done well in the LHAC this year and probably fine or exceptional every year. The problem and in my opinion the difference is the Bottom Teams in each conference. Without listing bad schools, look at each conference and compare the bottom 5 every conference.

What you will find is the bad teams in the LHAC ( for the most part ) are way better than the bad teams in the other conferences. So each week the games are tougher. So while I believe the best teams in each conference are all tremendous and would be successful in any conference, for me it is looking at how bad the worst teams in conference are. In my opinion.

That being said hats off to the winners in each division. You all earned it and should be honored.

[konjo78]

I agree 100% with you. There are just some lhac fans that always rub things in with their conference. Its a very very good conference but when comparing them to A conferences like the ICC, heritage and westpac is ridiculous. You don't compare the ACC with the PSAC. This year I would call the MAC a better conference.

[Footballfans4life]

Great point.