Page 2 of 2
Re: Despite shortcomings, Pitt Is It!
Posted: August 29th, 2005, 11:27 pm
by The Ancient Enemy
Pitt sucks.
:twisted:
Re: Despite shortcomings, Pitt Is It!
Posted: August 30th, 2005, 12:21 am
by flybynight
[quote="bdftbllham55";p="101232"]
[BTW, TAE owns you.
[/quote]
[quote="The Ancient Enemy";p="101291"]
Pitt sucks.
:twisted:
[/quote]
yea,your owned :lol:
Posted: August 30th, 2005, 11:05 am
by hilltoppanther
flybynight, the correct response would have been "you're owned" not "your owned."
Now it looks like you are owned!
Posted: August 30th, 2005, 11:13 am
by hilltoppanther
bdftbllham55,
Who's the idiot?
If you would have read my entire post, then maybe you would have understood it. I said that the early commits who changed their minds in the past, did so under Harris. The man had zero people skills. Now that Wannstedt is in town, they will stay committed! Mark it down.
In hindsight, the two main decommits have turned out to be busts anyway. Morelli probably would have never played a down at Pitt. The play book was too complicated for him. Andrew Johnson has fallen down the depth chart at Miami. With the stable of running backs that Pitt has now and has coming in next year, Johnson will not be missed.
Re: Despite shortcomings, Pitt Is It!
Posted: August 30th, 2005, 2:13 pm
by The Ancient Enemy
You're definitely a "bust" when you're a sophomore. Especially when you are on the best depth chart in the country.
Posted: August 30th, 2005, 2:28 pm
by HardCoreFan
[quote="hilltoppanther";p="101312"]Now that Wannstedt is in town, they will stay committed! Mark it down.[/quote]
Everyone loses a verbal here and there... thats how things go. Mark that down.