LHAC Boys Hoops

Hardwood chatter
CRUSHER92
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 236
Joined: September 16th, 2004, 12:24 pm

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by CRUSHER92 »

16-6 BC after 1
CRUSHER92
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 236
Joined: September 16th, 2004, 12:24 pm

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by CRUSHER92 »

28-22 at half
CRUSHER92
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 236
Joined: September 16th, 2004, 12:24 pm

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by CRUSHER92 »

41-29 after 3
CRUSHER92
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 236
Joined: September 16th, 2004, 12:24 pm

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by CRUSHER92 »

51-31 with 511 left
Crimson's Ghost
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 11200
Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by Crimson's Ghost »

61-35 Final. Crazy thing is, I could see McCort winning 16-17 regular season games, Carroll is just that much better than everyone else.

Who is going to beat them?
CRUSHER92
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 236
Joined: September 16th, 2004, 12:24 pm

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by CRUSHER92 »

Totally agree. McCort will win most games but will struggle to score. Next week BC plays Johnstown and Richland. Not sure if either of those will be close or not.
CRUSHER92
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 236
Joined: September 16th, 2004, 12:24 pm

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by CRUSHER92 »

And in my honest opinion, I would take Marcus over Nemo any day.
konjo78
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 4561
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 5:17 pm
Location: tri cities, Washington

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by konjo78 »

That BC recruiting machine is turning out a great team this year
Crimson's Ghost
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 11200
Joined: June 24th, 2011, 10:43 am

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by Crimson's Ghost »

Head to head last year.

Nemo 23 points 8 rebound in Game 1. 15 points 11 rebounds in game 2 both McCort wins.
Lee 16 points 12 rebound in Game 1. 7 points rebound stats weren't given.


Lee has gotten a lot better from the first year or two I watched him. He used to very mechanical and weak, and could get pushed around. He has a good understanding of who he is and what he is capable of. Hes not a very flashy guy, rebounds and keeps the ball high and finishes. IMO, Lee needs people to set him up.

trexler is two inches shorter, quicker and more explosive. He can create if he needs to and still has strong touch around the rim. He's a lot different of a player.

Now I wasn't at the game, Nemo could have played terrible tonight for all I know. Still if I had to line up everyone between McCort and Carroll, and I had first pick in a pick up game, I would take Trexler. And second pick I would take Martinazzi, and third pick I'd take Lee.


I wouldn't say thats a you're wrong, but I think Trexler is more self sufficient whereas Lee is better with a guard setting him up.
CRUSHER92
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 236
Joined: September 16th, 2004, 12:24 pm

Re: LHAC Boys Hoops

Post by CRUSHER92 »

A little too self sufficient for my liking. Let's emotions get the best of him often!!! Skillwise I agree. Overall, I disagree.
Post Reply