Re: b.c vs heights?

A forum partnered with WesternPaFootball.net
User avatar
jack daniel
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2615
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 2:49 pm
Location: point stadium

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by jack daniel »

Huskies 35
Highlanders 21
"some may say you just got lucky, i personally believe you make your own luck by being good."
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by thebrigade »

superSTAR69 wrote:i think this is going to be a closer game then people predict. im feeling heights in the upset. this is truely a test for carrols secondary.
now you wouldnt be picking this upset because you lost kephart to them would you? heights is 0-6 i believe and carroll has shut down everyone but f.h. and richland... i will take kephart and carroll in another big win
lakersfan24
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 869
Joined: February 10th, 2008, 9:33 pm

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by lakersfan24 »

and FH and Richland threw all over BC.. CH is a throwing time.

CH will keep it close IMHO
kmr
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 642
Joined: March 11th, 2009, 11:57 pm

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by kmr »

I'm a BC backer and I also think its going to be scary close. At CH anything can happen, but the weather might be a factor in this one showers for friday. If its raining and the field is sloppy BC by 2-3 tds. Lookin at the schedule after the CC game b/c of the passing game this date scared me the most of the remaining games. If BC doesn't jump out to a 2 td lead and its close I can see CH pullin it out in the end.
User avatar
WPIAL~Titan
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 3837
Joined: September 5th, 2003, 6:15 pm
Location: Titan Town, PA

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by WPIAL~Titan »

The QB from Heights (Vescovi) is the real deal. He was very impressive vs. PC. Vescovi sees the field well, is mobile for his size, and has a strong arm. He forced a few throws vs. PC which resulted in INTs and a few near INTs, but that's to be expected when there is minimal talent surrounding him and he tries to make things happen like any good athlete does.

Heights was a little soft on defense, so In would say that CH will have to outscore Carroll, plus put up a few non-traditional TDs to win (ie-INT return, special teams TDs, fumble return, etc.) IF Heights is to win this game, they will have to score 30+ points, play mistake free, and hope BC turns it over a few times.
"Those who say it can't be done are being interrupted by those who are doing it."

Author unknown
woninthetrenches
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 345
Joined: September 28th, 2010, 9:42 pm

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by woninthetrenches »

The winds Friday are going to be around 18 mph. Hard to throw in that. If Vescovi is pressured, he will throw ints. and make mistakes.
thebrigade
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 775
Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by thebrigade »

lakersfan24 wrote:and FH and Richland threw all over BC.. CH is a throwing time.

CH will keep it close IMHO
richland yes.. fh no.. fh threw 6 passes... duke ran all over them i still think it will be a big win for bc
User avatar
jack daniel
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2615
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 2:49 pm
Location: point stadium

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by jack daniel »

0-6 will not beat 5-1
"some may say you just got lucky, i personally believe you make your own luck by being good."
User avatar
SRV
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 278
Joined: February 28th, 2004, 10:27 am

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by SRV »

BC 38
CH 21
User avatar
jack daniel
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 2615
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 2:49 pm
Location: point stadium

Re: b.c vs heights?

Post by jack daniel »

superSTAR69 wrote:heights keep the games close every year
keeps it close every year? they've played 4 times since 2004 BC has won by a combined score of 147-32. with the closest game being 24-6. since when is that considered keeping it close? and this is in no way at all a knock on heights. its a knock on superSTAR's flase statement
"some may say you just got lucky, i personally believe you make your own luck by being good."
Post Reply