Re: b.c vs heights?
- jack daniel
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 2615
- Joined: August 13th, 2010, 2:49 pm
- Location: point stadium
Re: b.c vs heights?
Huskies 35
Highlanders 21
Highlanders 21
"some may say you just got lucky, i personally believe you make your own luck by being good."
-
thebrigade
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 775
- Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm
Re: b.c vs heights?
now you wouldnt be picking this upset because you lost kephart to them would you? heights is 0-6 i believe and carroll has shut down everyone but f.h. and richland... i will take kephart and carroll in another big winsuperSTAR69 wrote:i think this is going to be a closer game then people predict. im feeling heights in the upset. this is truely a test for carrols secondary.
-
lakersfan24
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 869
- Joined: February 10th, 2008, 9:33 pm
Re: b.c vs heights?
and FH and Richland threw all over BC.. CH is a throwing time.
CH will keep it close IMHO
CH will keep it close IMHO
Re: b.c vs heights?
I'm a BC backer and I also think its going to be scary close. At CH anything can happen, but the weather might be a factor in this one showers for friday. If its raining and the field is sloppy BC by 2-3 tds. Lookin at the schedule after the CC game b/c of the passing game this date scared me the most of the remaining games. If BC doesn't jump out to a 2 td lead and its close I can see CH pullin it out in the end.
- WPIAL~Titan
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 3837
- Joined: September 5th, 2003, 6:15 pm
- Location: Titan Town, PA
Re: b.c vs heights?
The QB from Heights (Vescovi) is the real deal. He was very impressive vs. PC. Vescovi sees the field well, is mobile for his size, and has a strong arm. He forced a few throws vs. PC which resulted in INTs and a few near INTs, but that's to be expected when there is minimal talent surrounding him and he tries to make things happen like any good athlete does.
Heights was a little soft on defense, so In would say that CH will have to outscore Carroll, plus put up a few non-traditional TDs to win (ie-INT return, special teams TDs, fumble return, etc.) IF Heights is to win this game, they will have to score 30+ points, play mistake free, and hope BC turns it over a few times.
Heights was a little soft on defense, so In would say that CH will have to outscore Carroll, plus put up a few non-traditional TDs to win (ie-INT return, special teams TDs, fumble return, etc.) IF Heights is to win this game, they will have to score 30+ points, play mistake free, and hope BC turns it over a few times.
"Those who say it can't be done are being interrupted by those who are doing it."
Author unknown
Author unknown
-
woninthetrenches
- Assistant Coach

- Posts: 345
- Joined: September 28th, 2010, 9:42 pm
Re: b.c vs heights?
The winds Friday are going to be around 18 mph. Hard to throw in that. If Vescovi is pressured, he will throw ints. and make mistakes.
-
thebrigade
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 775
- Joined: September 18th, 2010, 9:47 pm
Re: b.c vs heights?
richland yes.. fh no.. fh threw 6 passes... duke ran all over them i still think it will be a big win for bclakersfan24 wrote:and FH and Richland threw all over BC.. CH is a throwing time.
CH will keep it close IMHO
- jack daniel
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 2615
- Joined: August 13th, 2010, 2:49 pm
- Location: point stadium
Re: b.c vs heights?
0-6 will not beat 5-1
"some may say you just got lucky, i personally believe you make your own luck by being good."
Re: b.c vs heights?
BC 38
CH 21
CH 21
- jack daniel
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 2615
- Joined: August 13th, 2010, 2:49 pm
- Location: point stadium
Re: b.c vs heights?
keeps it close every year? they've played 4 times since 2004 BC has won by a combined score of 147-32. with the closest game being 24-6. since when is that considered keeping it close? and this is in no way at all a knock on heights. its a knock on superSTAR's flase statementsuperSTAR69 wrote:heights keep the games close every year
"some may say you just got lucky, i personally believe you make your own luck by being good."