Page 1 of 4
is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 1st, 2015, 1:16 pm
by billmurray
http://www.westernpafootball.net/news/i ... fications/
leave a comment on the article on the site please for feedback, discuss here too
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 1st, 2015, 2:48 pm
by Eaglealum
Time for 3 classes- big, small, private.... Period.
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 1st, 2015, 5:46 pm
by billmurray
Eaglealum wrote:Time for 3 classes- big, small, private.... Period.
lol..ok
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 1st, 2015, 5:51 pm
by CITYBOY
Time for 3 classes- big, small, private.... Period.
I Like it!!!!!!
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 1st, 2015, 9:19 pm
by Blueandwhitefan
CITYBOY wrote: Time for 3 classes- big, small, private.... Period.
I Like it!!!!!!
Me too, BUT you have to include schools like Lincoln Park in with the privates.
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 1st, 2015, 11:25 pm
by upnorth
Blueandwhitefan wrote:CITYBOY wrote: Time for 3 classes- big, small, private.... Period.
I Like it!!!!!!
Me too, BUT you have to include schools like Lincoln Park in with the privates.
Sorry, but they are public schools. You have to keep them or create yet another class just for them.
Seriously though, one very interesting concept from the article mentioned a "two year success factor" which would promote consistently successful teams up one classification for the next two year cycle while also providing an option for them to slide back down if they face a downturn. I would prefer an evaluation every year, but I could see how that could have a negative impact to scheduling for districts that create a district wide schedule within classes.
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 1st, 2015, 11:51 pm
by Husker33
After seeing the brackets for A and AA, I don't think I'm in favor of 6 classes. I think 5 may be the better way to break up AAA and AAAA.
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 2nd, 2015, 8:18 am
by Manfred
I don't have a problem with a separate class for either privates or "religious-based" schools.
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 2nd, 2015, 9:38 am
by billmurray
i was hoping for a serious debate....here are what would be class sizes:
Now:
1a…1-74…145 schools
2a…175-299..146 schools
3a…300-492..145 schools
4a…493-infinity..145 schools
6 classes
1a..1-147---–97
2a..148-209-–97
3a..210-300-–98
4a..301-409-–98
5a..410-607-–97
6a..608-above–94
I truly believe if they adopt the move up policy it helps with the private/cath debate. and if they use recent success as in past 2 cycles, teams will be placed where they should be with the woods/preps at the top. It also doesn't punish schools like BG who are just having a good run
Re: is it time for 6 classes?
Posted: January 2nd, 2015, 1:49 pm
by Husker33
The single A playoff bracket is basically. D6 & D7 is one side of the bracket and the rest of the state is on the other side of the bracket. D5/D9 and I believe several others would have either 8 or 9 regular season game while district 6 would still play 10 regular season games.