WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS

Hardwood chatter
Hook Em Horns4
Freshman
Freshman
Posts: 14
Joined: January 19th, 2011, 9:55 pm

Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS

Post by Hook Em Horns4 »

LHAC is a way better...
PeteRose101
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 211
Joined: October 25th, 2010, 12:17 pm

Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS

Post by PeteRose101 »

laurel highlands has jtown and forest hills. everyone else is sub par and dont hve a whole lot to say(yes, im saying mccort is sub par). west pac has shade and north star and the rest is sub par both can comepete in LHAC, so i dont think LHAC is much more dominant than west pac by any means
thetruth22
Junior
Junior
Posts: 114
Joined: June 14th, 2008, 1:57 pm

Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS

Post by thetruth22 »

PeteRose101 wrote:laurel highlands has jtown and forest hills. everyone else is sub par and dont hve a whole lot to say(yes, im saying mccort is sub par). west pac has shade and north star and the rest is sub par both can comepete in LHAC, so i dont think LHAC is much more dominant than west pac by any means
The problem with this statement is the WestPac has 1 or 2 teams that can compete in the LHAC you got that argument. What I'm saying is that every team in the LHAC can compete in the WestPac. What that means is the LHAC is better by far as a whole.

I know you WestPac supporters are so sensitive.................
User avatar
Portage Alum
Official BleacherCoach
Official BleacherCoach
Posts: 396
Joined: October 4th, 2005, 10:48 am

Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS

Post by Portage Alum »

Again, you are all idiots. Your comparing Single A schools that graduate 30+ kids in some instances to AA and AAA schools that graduate 175+. Of course the LHAC is the stronger conference, this is such an assinine argument.

~PA
PeteRose101
Grad Assistant
Grad Assistant
Posts: 211
Joined: October 25th, 2010, 12:17 pm

Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS

Post by PeteRose101 »

obviously bigger schools have better chances to compete? its logical , but all you LHAC fans are so high on ur team , ur team isnt any good if u can beat a west pac team tht doesnt prove anything. And thats not all entirely true either id take Berlin, blacklick, cvalley as well( besides north star and shade) against laurel highland teams and they could scrounge up some wins no doubt
Crimson09Crazy

Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS

Post by Crimson09Crazy »

to be all fair, I'd be willing to bet Bedford is the worse team among both conferences.
But the LHAC appears to be down, as bad as I can ever remember it being.

But on good years I'd still take Johnstown, Wesmont, Bishop McCort, Central Cambria, Bishop Carroll, Cambria Heights ect over any West Pac Schools. Sorry thats how I see it. And all of those schools have been fairly successful over the past 10 years. I mean North Star, Shade, Township and Conemaugh Valley are the only 4 schools in that league that could even be a factor in the LHAC.

Historically 7-8 teams in the LHAC would be in the top 2-3 of the WestPAC.
Post Reply