WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS
-
Hook Em Horns4
- Freshman

- Posts: 14
- Joined: January 19th, 2011, 9:55 pm
Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS
LHAC is a way better...
-
PeteRose101
- Grad Assistant

- Posts: 211
- Joined: October 25th, 2010, 12:17 pm
Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS
laurel highlands has jtown and forest hills. everyone else is sub par and dont hve a whole lot to say(yes, im saying mccort is sub par). west pac has shade and north star and the rest is sub par both can comepete in LHAC, so i dont think LHAC is much more dominant than west pac by any means
-
thetruth22
- Junior

- Posts: 114
- Joined: June 14th, 2008, 1:57 pm
Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS
The problem with this statement is the WestPac has 1 or 2 teams that can compete in the LHAC you got that argument. What I'm saying is that every team in the LHAC can compete in the WestPac. What that means is the LHAC is better by far as a whole.PeteRose101 wrote:laurel highlands has jtown and forest hills. everyone else is sub par and dont hve a whole lot to say(yes, im saying mccort is sub par). west pac has shade and north star and the rest is sub par both can comepete in LHAC, so i dont think LHAC is much more dominant than west pac by any means
I know you WestPac supporters are so sensitive.................
- Portage Alum
- Official BleacherCoach

- Posts: 396
- Joined: October 4th, 2005, 10:48 am
Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS
Again, you are all idiots. Your comparing Single A schools that graduate 30+ kids in some instances to AA and AAA schools that graduate 175+. Of course the LHAC is the stronger conference, this is such an assinine argument.
~PA
~PA
-
PeteRose101
- Grad Assistant

- Posts: 211
- Joined: October 25th, 2010, 12:17 pm
Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS
obviously bigger schools have better chances to compete? its logical , but all you LHAC fans are so high on ur team , ur team isnt any good if u can beat a west pac team tht doesnt prove anything. And thats not all entirely true either id take Berlin, blacklick, cvalley as well( besides north star and shade) against laurel highland teams and they could scrounge up some wins no doubt
-
Crimson09Crazy
Re: WESTPAC AND LAUREL HIGHLANDS
to be all fair, I'd be willing to bet Bedford is the worse team among both conferences.
But the LHAC appears to be down, as bad as I can ever remember it being.
But on good years I'd still take Johnstown, Wesmont, Bishop McCort, Central Cambria, Bishop Carroll, Cambria Heights ect over any West Pac Schools. Sorry thats how I see it. And all of those schools have been fairly successful over the past 10 years. I mean North Star, Shade, Township and Conemaugh Valley are the only 4 schools in that league that could even be a factor in the LHAC.
Historically 7-8 teams in the LHAC would be in the top 2-3 of the WestPAC.
But the LHAC appears to be down, as bad as I can ever remember it being.
But on good years I'd still take Johnstown, Wesmont, Bishop McCort, Central Cambria, Bishop Carroll, Cambria Heights ect over any West Pac Schools. Sorry thats how I see it. And all of those schools have been fairly successful over the past 10 years. I mean North Star, Shade, Township and Conemaugh Valley are the only 4 schools in that league that could even be a factor in the LHAC.
Historically 7-8 teams in the LHAC would be in the top 2-3 of the WestPAC.